ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Comparing Two Methods of Minimally-Ischemic Cardiac Preservation in Life-Supporting Cardiac Xenotransplantation Model

C. E. Goerlich1, A. Singh1, D. Kaczorowski1, M. Abdullah1, B. Lewis1, I. Tatarov1, A. Hershfeld1, T. Zhang1, E. Strauss1, P. Odonkor1, B. Williams1, D. Ayares2, B. Griffith1, M. Mohiuddin1

1Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 2Surgery, Revivicor, Blacksburg, VA

Meeting: 2020 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: A-266

Keywords: Heart preservation, Heart/lung transplantation, Ischemia, Preservation solutions

Session Information

Session Name: Poster Session A: Xenotransplantation

Session Type: Poster Session

Date: Saturday, May 30, 2020

Session Time: 3:15pm-4:00pm

 Presentation Time: 3:30pm-4:00pm

Location: Virtual

*Purpose: Transplantation of organs from animals to humans (xenotransplantation) has been proposed to address the critical shortage of organs for transplantation. The use of genetically engineered organ xenografts, including knock-out (KO) of alpha 1-3 galactosyltransferase (GTKO) along with insertion of a human complement regulator genes (hCD46-human CD46, hDAF-human decay accelerating factor, hTBM-human thrombomodulin) and other cell surface carbohydrate KOs, has been helpful in circumventing acute rejection. However, perioperative cardiac xenograft dysfunction (PCXD) still occurs in 40-60% of life-supporting xenotransplantations. Non-ischemic cardiac preservation (NICP) between procurement and implantation to the recipient has been shown to prevent PCXD in GTKO.hCD46.hTBM models, however, using a cardioplegia solution with several unknown principle components. Here we investigate the role of minimally ischemic static preservation (MISP) versus NICP technique in overcoming PCXD.

*Methods: Specific pathogen-free baboons of either sex weighing 15-30 kg (2-3 years of age) were used as recipients. 6 to 8-week-old genetically modified pigs with hTBM or triple knock out-GTKO.B4KO.CMAHKO pigs with or without hCD46 and hDAF) were used as donors. Expression of transgenes were consistent and high level across all pigs. NICP was performed using an XVIVO perfusion system for 2-4 hours and continuously perfused with Steen solution at 8°C with pressure maintained at 20mmHg at a physiological pH (7.2-7.6). Static preservation with MICP was performed with 30cc/kg of blood cardioplegia using 25% concentration of fresh oxygenated donor blood. All animals were used in compliance with guidelines provided by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

*Results: GTKO.hCD46.hTBM donors (n=3) without MICP prior to transplantation exhibited a 33% incidence of PCXD, an incidence that is lower than reported in the literature, compared to 100% incidence of PCXD in donors with traditional cardioplegia and static preservation (n=3). However, all NICP (n=2) avoided PCXD but overall survival was limited by intracardiac thrombus, likely related to lack of hTBM. Histologic examination revealed no signs of immunologic rejection but non-hTBM expressing grafts exhibited both microscopic and macroscopic thrombotic phenomena.

*Conclusions: Both MICP and NICP reduce the incidence of PCXD. Further studies need to be conducted with hTBM-containing grafts for further elucidation of NICP on overall survival of pig cardiac xenografts.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Goerlich CE, Singh A, Kaczorowski D, Abdullah M, Lewis B, Tatarov I, Hershfeld A, Zhang T, Strauss E, Odonkor P, Williams B, Ayares D, Griffith B, Mohiuddin M. Comparing Two Methods of Minimally-Ischemic Cardiac Preservation in Life-Supporting Cardiac Xenotransplantation Model [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2020; 20 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/comparing-two-methods-of-minimally-ischemic-cardiac-preservation-in-life-supporting-cardiac-xenotransplantation-model/. Accessed May 8, 2025.

« Back to 2020 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences