ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Single Cell RNAseq Analysis of Human Renal Allograft Rejection Demonstrates Distinct Transcriptomic Profiles That Vary Based on the Type of Maintenance Immunosuppression

T. Shi1, A. Burg1, K. Roskin2, J. Rush3, B. Haraldsson3, A. Shields4, R. Alloway4, E. Woodle5, D. Hildeman1

1Immunobiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, 2Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, 3Novartis Pharmaceuticals AG, Basel, Switzerland, 4Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 5Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH

Meeting: 2022 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: 1285

Keywords: Biopsy, Genomics, Graft-infiltrating lymphocytes, Leukocytes

Topic: Basic Science » Basic Science » 12 - Immunosuppression & Tolerance: Preclinical & Translational Studies

Session Information

Session Name: Immunosuppression & Tolerance: Preclinical & Translational Studies

Session Type: Poster Abstract

Date: Monday, June 6, 2022

Session Time: 7:00pm-8:00pm

 Presentation Time: 7:00pm-8:00pm

Location: Hynes Halls C & D

*Purpose: Rejection therapy has remained unchanged for 60 years and is associated with significant failure and infection rates. Development of new anti-rejection therapies requires mechanistic understanding of transplant rejection. Here, we employed single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) to redefine renal allograft rejection (RAR) with single cell resolution.

*Methods: Biopsies and urine samples were obtained at the time of initial RAR from 4 patients on either iscalimab- (anti-CD40 antibody) or calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based maintenance immunosuppression (IS). Biopsies were digested at 4C with psychrophilic enzymes, and scRNAseq, including V(D)J sequencing, was performed on both biopsy and urine samples. Cell populations were analyzed based on their gene expression profiles using Seurat. Gene expression profiles were compared between infiltrating immune cells isolated from CNI vs iscalimab treated patients.

*Results: Analysis revealed similar frequencies of various immune cell populations within biopsies from patients rejecting under CNI vs iscalimab. Cells from iscalimab biopsies clustered similarly to each other, but distinctly from cells from CNI biopsies, indicating reproducible transcriptomic profiles for each IS therapy (Fig. 1). Myeloid cell populations between iscalimab- and CNI-treated patients cluster closely together and displayed similar gene expression profiles. Importantly, T cell and B cell populations under iscalimab clustered distinctly from those under CNI. Consistent with known effects of CD40 blockage, B cell analysis demonstrated naïve, transitional, and follicular profiles in CNI-treated patients, but not in iscalimab-treated patients. Ongoing work will further characterize differential gene expression in the T cell and myeloid cell populations between the CNI and iscalimab samples.

*Conclusions: Distinct gene expression profiles are observed in CD8+ T cells and B cells depending upon the type of IS therapy. These data suggest that the underlying biology of transplant rejection likely varies based on the nature of IS therapy, thereby emphasizing the importance for understanding rejection mechanisms under distinct IS regimens.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Shi T, Burg A, Roskin K, Rush J, Haraldsson B, Shields A, Alloway R, Woodle E, Hildeman D. Single Cell RNAseq Analysis of Human Renal Allograft Rejection Demonstrates Distinct Transcriptomic Profiles That Vary Based on the Type of Maintenance Immunosuppression [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2022; 22 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/single-cell-rnaseq-analysis-of-human-renal-allograft-rejection-demonstrates-distinct-transcriptomic-profiles-that-vary-based-on-the-type-of-maintenance-immunosuppression/. Accessed May 18, 2025.

« Back to 2022 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences