Impact of Everolimus Added to a De Novo Belatacept Regimen on the Risk of BK Viremia After Kidney Transplant.
C. Larsen,1 M. Alseiari,2 S. Chandran,2 F. Vincenti,2 D. Wojciechowski.1
1Division of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
2Division of Nephrology, UCSF, San Francisco, CA
Meeting: 2017 American Transplant Congress
Abstract number: A217
Keywords: Kidney transplantation, Polyma virus, Sirolimus (SLR), Viral therapy
Session Information
Session Name: Poster Session A: Kidney: Polyoma
Session Type: Poster Session
Date: Saturday, April 29, 2017
Session Time: 5:30pm-7:30pm
Presentation Time: 5:30pm-7:30pm
Location: Hall D1
Introduction
BK viremia is a common complication following kidney transplantation. In vitro data suggest that inhibition of the mTOR–SP6-kinase pathway prevents expression of early viral genes necessary for replication. We hypothesized that the utilization of an mTOR inhibitor (mTORI) instead of MMF as the antiproliferative agent in combination with belatacept would reduce the risk of BK viremia.
Methods
Retrospective analysis of 58 kidney transplant recipients receiving de novo belatacept who were either converted from MMF to everolimus at 30 days post-transplant as part of a clinical protocol (“Everolimus group”, n=43) or remained on MMF (“MMF group”, n=15). All patients were screened with monthly quantitative BKV DNA PCR in plasma for the first 6 months post-transplant. We compared the incidence of BK viremia at 6 months in the two groups using Pearson's chi-squared test.
Results
Demographic and clinical characteristics are listed in Table 1. The incidence of BK viremia at 6 months was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Viremia appeared later in the everolimus group than in the MMF group (mean POD 117 vs. 63; P=0.16) but this difference was not statistically significant. There were no differences in the peak viral load or time to peak viremia between the 2 groups.
Conclusion
No differences were seen in the incidence or severity of BK viremia among kidney transplant recipients on everolimus vs. MMF in combination with belatacept. There was a non-significant trend toward later onset of viremia in the everolimus group. Additional follow up is ongoing to examine outcomes at 1 year post-transplant.
Characteristic | Everolimus group(n=43) | MMF group(n=15) | P Value |
Male gender (%) | 58 | 67 | 0.56 |
Race | 0.23 | ||
White (%) | 39 | 73 | |
Black | 11 | 13 | |
Other | 44 | 20 | |
Ureteral Stent (%) | 9 | 20 | 0.66 |
No. of rejection episodes | 5 | 1 | 0.54 |
6-month eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | 62 | 58 | 0.55 |
BK Infection | |||
6-month viremia incidence (%) | 27 | 20 | 0.56 |
Mean onset of viremia (POD) | 117 | 63 | 0.16 |
Peak viral load (copies/ml) | 376,372 | 45,783 | 0.42 |
CITATION INFORMATION: Larsen C, Alseiari M, Chandran S, Vincenti F, Wojciechowski D. Impact of Everolimus Added to a De Novo Belatacept Regimen on the Risk of BK Viremia After Kidney Transplant. Am J Transplant. 2017;17 (suppl 3).
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Larsen C, Alseiari M, Chandran S, Vincenti F, Wojciechowski D. Impact of Everolimus Added to a De Novo Belatacept Regimen on the Risk of BK Viremia After Kidney Transplant. [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2017; 17 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/impact-of-everolimus-added-to-a-de-novo-belatacept-regimen-on-the-risk-of-bk-viremia-after-kidney-transplant/. Accessed November 25, 2024.« Back to 2017 American Transplant Congress