ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Deceased Donor Procurement Biopsy Practices, Interpretation, and Histology-Based Decision Making: A Survey of US Transplant Centers

V. Fleetwood1, D. Axelrod2, Y. Caliskan1, H. Randall1, J. Wellen3, M. Lichtenberger3, C. Dedert1, R. Rothweiler4, G. F. Marklin4, D. Brockmeier4, M. A. Schnitzler1, S. A. Husain5, S. Mohan5, B. Kasiske6, M. Cooper7, K. L. Lentine1

1Saint Louis U., St. Louis, MO, 2U. of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 3WUSTL, St. Louis, MO, 4Mid-Am. Trans., St. Louis, MO, 5Columbia U., New York, NY, 6Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, 7MedStar Transpl. Inst., Washington, DC

Meeting: 2022 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: 752

Keywords: Biopsy, Donors, marginal, Graft acceptance, Histology

Topic: Clinical Science » Kidney » 32 - Kidney Deceased Donor Selection

Session Information

Session Name: Kidney Deceased Donor Selection

Session Type: Poster Abstract

Date: Saturday, June 4, 2022

Session Time: 5:30pm-7:00pm

 Presentation Time: 5:30pm-7:00pm

Location: Hynes Halls C & D

*Purpose: In light of contemporary controversies on the utility of kidney procurement biopsies in predicting allograft outcomes and guiding organ acceptance, we surveyed transplant providers regarding biopsy practices, interpretation and applications to decision making.

*Methods: We designed and conducted a survey of US kidney transplant programs by email and professional society LISTSERV postings (4/2021-6/2021). The instrument assessed constructs including biopsy frequency, modality, availability of specialized pathology, interpretation, and impact on practices.

*Results: Of responses from 112 transplant centers, 95 providers endorsed involvement in organ acceptance (72.6% transpl. surgeon, 20.0% transpl. nephrologist, 6.3% transpl. coordinator, 1.1% APP). Over a third of centers (35.7%) obtained procurement biopsies on most to all kidneys. Most providers decided to biopsy jointly with the OPO (82.9%) and used formal criteria (72.3%), although almost half reported requesting biopsies outside of criteria (41.5%.) Wedge biopsies were preferentially obtained (56.3%.) Most respondents used a semiquantitative scoring system for interpretation (56.8%); the majority preferred the Remuzzi score. Several respondents reported rarely/never having access to renal specialist pathologists (36.7%) or telepathology (58.4%, Fig. A) Age, diabetes, and AKI were commonly cited reasons to obtain biopsy. Severe glomerulosclerosis was acceptable to 18.9% of respondents, but less than 10% would accept severe arteriosclerosis or interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA, Fig. A) Most respondents reported a favorable biopsy would encourage them to accept a marginal kidney (71.6%); almost half indicated an unfavorable biopsy would lead to decline in a standard criteria kidney (46.3%.)

*Conclusions: The procurement biopsy remains common despite poor exposure to experienced renal pathologists, either at center or remotely. Respondents appear to use “good” biopsies as a tool to accept marginal kidneys, but almost half find a “bad” biopsy a reason to decline an otherwise clinically acceptable kidney. Further prospective study of the impact of biopsy findings on organ acceptance and patient-centered outcomes is needed.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Fleetwood V, Axelrod D, Caliskan Y, Randall H, Wellen J, Lichtenberger M, Dedert C, Rothweiler R, Marklin GF, Brockmeier D, Schnitzler MA, Husain SA, Mohan S, Kasiske B, Cooper M, Lentine KL. Deceased Donor Procurement Biopsy Practices, Interpretation, and Histology-Based Decision Making: A Survey of US Transplant Centers [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2022; 22 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/deceased-donor-procurement-biopsy-practices-interpretation-and-histology-based-decision-making-a-survey-of-us-transplant-centers/. Accessed May 16, 2025.

« Back to 2022 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences