An Individualized Strategy Using Virus and Immune-Based Markers to Prevent Cytomegalovirus Disease after Face Transplantation
R. Razonable, H. Amer, S. Mardini.
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Meeting: 2018 American Transplant Congress
Abstract number: 284
Keywords: Cytomeglovirus, Ganciclovir, T cells, Viral therapy
Session Information
Session Time: 2:30pm-4:00pm
Presentation Time: 3:06pm-3:18pm
Location: Room 303
Introduction: There is limited data on CMV prevention after face transplantation. We report an individualized approach using prophylaxis followed by surveillance and preemptive therapy guided by viral load and CMV-specific and global CD8+ T cell markers.
Methods: A 31-year-old man received a near-total facial allotransplant for gunshot-related facial deformities. He received Thymoglobulin, then tacrolimus, mycophenolate and prednisone. He was a CMV D+/R-, and received valganciclovir prophylaxis. Serial CD8+ T Cell Immune Competence (TIC) was performed, as measured by interferon-gamma production and CD107a/b degranulation in response to non-specific mitogen or specific MHC Class I alleles/CMV peptides using flow cytometry. CMV replication was measured by CMV PCR.
Results: No CMV-specific CD8 T cell immunity developed during prophylaxis (Table 1). Valganciclovir prophylaxis was discontinued at 7 months, despite lack of CMV-specific immunity, but with sustained normalized global CD8+ T cell function.Asymptomatic CMV replication (CMV 549 IU/ml plasma) occurred 3 months after valganciclovir prophylaxis. At time of viremia, the total CMV-specific CD8+ T cell count was 12 cells/uL. CMV TIC score was 4 indicating effective immunity (Table 1). Valganciclovir treatment resulted in immediate and sustained viral clearance. CMV IgM and IgG were detected. No CMV relapse was detected 17 months after transplant.
Conclusion: Viral and immunologic monitoring allows for an individualized approach to CMV prevention after face transplantation. Even without CMV-specific immunity, a robust global immune function may signify the ability to develop effective immunity during CMV infection.
Variables
|
Mo. 3 | Mo. 4 | Mo. 5 | Mo. 6 | Mo. 7 | Mo. 11 |
Total T cell count | 187 | 164 | 163 | 189 | 184 | 468 |
CD4 count | NC | 56 | 65 | 71 | NC | 87 |
CD8 count | 114 | 129 | 98 | 108 | 91 | 367 |
CMV-specific CD8 T cells | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
Total Immune Competence score | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | 4 |
Interferon-gamma | 50.7 | 35.0 | 52.8 | 25.7 | 26.2 | 58.2 |
CD107a/b expression | 17.8 | 7.9 | 10.0 | 14.8 | 18.3 | 6.3 |
CMV DNA IU/ml plasma | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 549 |
CITATION INFORMATION: Razonable R., Amer H., Mardini S. An Individualized Strategy Using Virus and Immune-Based Markers to Prevent Cytomegalovirus Disease after Face Transplantation Am J Transplant. 2017;17 (suppl 3).
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Razonable R, Amer H, Mardini S. An Individualized Strategy Using Virus and Immune-Based Markers to Prevent Cytomegalovirus Disease after Face Transplantation [abstract]. https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/an-individualized-strategy-using-virus-and-immune-based-markers-to-prevent-cytomegalovirus-disease-after-face-transplantation/. Accessed November 21, 2024.« Back to 2018 American Transplant Congress