ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Advanced Search

What Are the Charges and Costs of Transplanting High MELD Patients?

K. Bortecen, B. Gelb, A. Winnick, G. Morgan, L. Teperman.

Transplant Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY.

Meeting: 2016 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: 443

Keywords: Allocation, High-risk, Liver transplantation, Outcome

Session Information

Date: Tuesday, June 14, 2016

Session Name: Concurrent Session: Liver: MELD, Allocation and Donor Issues (DCD/ECD) 1

Session Time: 2:30pm-4:00pm

 Presentation Time: 3:06pm-3:18pm

Location: Room 304

Related Abstracts
  • Time in the Operating Room Independently Predicts Blood Utilization, Charges, and a Cost Efficient Practice
  • Functional Status and Comorbidity Are Associated with High Costs After Liver Transplantation.

Purpose: There is a significant variation in the MELD scores and subsequent morbidity among liver recipients in the US. Larger OPOs consistently serve patients with advanced disease. Previous studies have shown 2.5 times greater prevalence of transplanted patients with MELD 24 in these OPOs. CMS recent reimbursement adjustments may disproportionately affect certain programs given their increased prevalence of patients with more advanced disease.

Methods: We analyzed the prevalence of transplants among patients with high UNET MELD scores and associated charges, costs, and reimbursements. We compared low, medium and high MELD score groups. Between 2014-2015, 43 liver transplants, all with >30 days survival, were analyzed.

Results: Only 2 had MELD scores below 25 at transplant, both of which from live donors. 95% of patients had MELD scores above 25 and among these, 18% had MELD 40 or were Status 1. Compared to the national average, our MELD scores were: 25% 21-30 (National 21.5%, p >0.05), 70.5% 31-40 (National 25.9%, p < 0.001), and 4.5% Status 1 (National 5.9%, p >0.05).

Payer mix of patients with MELD 40/Status 1 was 22% Medicaid, 22% Medicare and 56% commercial plans.

For MELD scores 21-30, hospital charges averaged $645,214 and reimbursements were $150,706. For MELD scores 31-39, charges were $686,720, and reimbursement were $139,776. Reviewing MELD 40/ Status 1 patients, the average hospital charges and reimbursements were $1,136,813 and $293,776 respectively. We compared their amounts to the MELD 40 patients who had hospital charges of $625,371 and reimbursements of $142,051. This demonstrated a loss of $843,037 for the first group and $483,320 for the second. Length of stay was 32 days for MELD 40/ Status 1 and 8 days for MELD 40 (p < 0.000).

Conclusion: 40 MELD patients have a huge financial impact on institutions. The difference between 25-39 and 40 MELD points is greater than half a million dollars. These data reflect and include dialysis, intubation and ICU stay but do not include rehabilitation expenses which will be the focus of another study. We find that our institution, which likely reflects many institutions in our OPO, serves sicker patients and therefore incurs higher costs but receives lower reimbursements, as they are based on national expected care costs for healthier patients. A broader sharing in the US may equalize costs. Payers should take into account the added financial burden of performing transplant in high MELD patients.

CITATION INFORMATION: Bortecen K, Gelb B, Winnick A, Morgan G, Teperman L. What Are the Charges and Costs of Transplanting High MELD Patients? Am J Transplant. 2016;16 (suppl 3).

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bortecen K, Gelb B, Winnick A, Morgan G, Teperman L. What Are the Charges and Costs of Transplanting High MELD Patients? [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2016; 16 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/what-are-the-charges-and-costs-of-transplanting-high-meld-patients/. Accessed March 5, 2021.

« Back to 2016 American Transplant Congress

Most Viewed Abstracts

  • This Week
  • This Month
  • All Time
  • Low GFR after Kidney Donation Is Not Chronic Kidney Disease
  • Subtherapeutic Low Tacrolimus Trough Levels (≤3.5 Ng /ml) Are A Risk Factor For Acute Rejection And Creatinine Doubling.
  • Is There a Difference Between DCD and DBD Kidney Transplantation with Similar KDPI?
  • Penis Transplantation: First U.S. Experience.
  • Kidney Dialysis after Heart Transplantation: The Short and Long Term Outcomes
  • Low GFR after Kidney Donation Is Not Chronic Kidney Disease
  • Subtherapeutic Low Tacrolimus Trough Levels (≤3.5 Ng /ml) Are A Risk Factor For Acute Rejection And Creatinine Doubling.
  • Penis Transplantation: First U.S. Experience.
  • A Decade of Donor-Derived Disease: A Report of the OPTN Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC).
  • Is There a Difference Between DCD and DBD Kidney Transplantation with Similar KDPI?
  • Penis Transplantation: First U.S. Experience.
  • Is There a Difference Between DCD and DBD Kidney Transplantation with Similar KDPI?
  • Low GFR after Kidney Donation Is Not Chronic Kidney Disease
  • Evidence of a Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interaction between Cannabidiol and Tacrolimus: A Case Report
  • Kidney Dialysis after Heart Transplantation: The Short and Long Term Outcomes

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2021 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.