ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Validation of Gene Expression Signatures Associated with Antibody-Mediated Rejection (ABMR) in Renal Allograft Biopsies (Bx) of HLA-Sensitized Patients

H. Zhang1, C. C. Nast2, N. Ammerman3, A. A. Vo3, S. C. Jordan3, M. Toyoda1

1Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 3Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

Meeting: 2019 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: A187

Keywords: Biopsy, Gene expression, Highly-sensitized, Rejection

Session Information

Session Name: Poster Session A: Kidney Chronic Antibody Mediated Rejection

Session Type: Poster Session

Date: Saturday, June 1, 2019

Session Time: 5:30pm-7:30pm

 Presentation Time: 5:30pm-7:30pm

Location: Hall C & D

*Purpose: “Thoroughly validated gene transcripts” in renal Bx was adopted as one of the criteria for ABMR diagnosis in the latest Banff classification. Previously, we identified a combination of 3 genes associated with ABMR. Here, we measured the mRNA transcript levels of these genes in Bx samples from 21 HLA-sensitized patients to further validate the assay for better ABMR diagnosis.

*Methods: Total RNA was extracted from 39 Bx (19 ABMR, 4 highly suspicious ABMR, 16 non-ABMR [9 cell-mediated rejection, 7 no rejection]) for reverse transcription, pre-amplification and qPCR to measure mRNA transcript levels of 3 genes (KLRF1, SH2D1B, CCL3). The mRNA levels were expressed as relative quantity vs. a reference RNA after normalized by GAPDH gene, and then ABMR gene scores (GS) were calculated. The GS diagnostic criterion for ABMR was ≥ 0.68.

*Results: Of 39 Bx, 25 (14 ABMR [Table-G1], 11 Non-ABMR [G4]) showed consistent results as assessed by pathology diagnosis and GS. Pathology in 4 Bx (Suspicious ABMR [G2]) was confirmed by GS, while others (G3 and G5) showed inconsistent results by pathology and GS. The GS in 5 ABMR Bx (G3) were < 0.68; 2 were from the same ABOi transplant patient, 1 was a chronic but not active ABMR Bx with low microvascular inflammation (MVI, g+ptc:1), and 1 (GS: 0.62) was a Bx post-Clazakizumab (CLZ) treatment with significant decrease of MVI and disappearance of donor-specific antibody (DSA) vs. pre-CLZ Bx (GS: 2.56), suggesting improvement of ABMR status. The GS in 5 Non-ABMR Bx (G5) were > 0.68; 2 would be ABMR if confirmed by “thoroughly validated gene transcripts” based on their pathology and the latest Banff criteria, and the other 3 Bx all had significant MVI (g+ptc: 2-3) from a patient with DSA history, thus their MVI may be caused by ABMR.

Bx Diagnosis Case # (%) GS Consistent with GS g+ptc
G1. ABMR 14 (35.9) 3.48 ± 3.70 Yes 3.6 ± 1.5
G2. Suspicious ABMR 4 (10.3) 1.33 ± 0.48 Yes 3.3 ± 1.0
G3. ABMR 5 (12.8) 0.44 ± 0.22 No 2.8 ± 1.1
G4. Non-ABMR 11 (28.2) 0.22 ± 0.18 Yes 0.5 ± 0.8
G5. Non-ABMR 5 (12.8) 1.57 ± 0.82 No 3.0 ± 1.0

*Conclusions: 64% of the 39 tested Bx showed consistent diagnosis by pathology and GS, while GS confirmed suspicious pathology-based ABMR for 10%. For the other 26% (same number of pathology-based ABMR and non-ABMR), the GS validation results suggested that both pathology and our GS might have their limitations for ABMR diagnosis. Further validation in larger patient cohorts will help clarify the utility of this ABMR GS.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Zhang H, Nast CC, Ammerman N, Vo AA, Jordan SC, Toyoda M. Validation of Gene Expression Signatures Associated with Antibody-Mediated Rejection (ABMR) in Renal Allograft Biopsies (Bx) of HLA-Sensitized Patients [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2019; 19 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/validation-of-gene-expression-signatures-associated-with-antibody-mediated-rejection-abmr-in-renal-allograft-biopsies-bx-of-hla-sensitized-patients/. Accessed May 9, 2025.

« Back to 2019 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences