ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Three-Way Comparison of Central DSA, %dd-cf DNA, and Molecular Biopsy Findings in the Trifecta Study

P. F. Halloran1, L. G. Hidalgo2, Z. Demko3, A. Prewett3, J. Reeve1, C. Lawrence4, D. Lowe4, P. Billings3, .. and the Trifecta Investigators5

1Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton AB, AB, Canada, 2University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 3Natera Inc., San Carlos, CA, 4One Lambda Inc., West Hills, CA, 5., ., AB, Canada

Meeting: 2022 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: 121

Keywords: Biopsy, HLA antibodies, Kidney transplantation

Topic: Clinical Science » Kidney » 45 - Kidney Chronic Antibody Mediated Rejection

Session Information

Session Name: Kidney Complications: Chronic Antibody Mediated Rejection & Immune Mediated Late Graft Failure

Session Type: Rapid Fire Oral Abstract

Date: Sunday, June 5, 2022

Session Time: 5:30pm-7:00pm

 Presentation Time: 6:50pm-7:00pm

Location: Hynes Room 302

*Purpose: Trifecta (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT04239703) is a prospective, IRB-approved, consented study of the relationships among three central tests in kidney transplant indication biopsies: molecular biopsy diagnoses (Molecular Microscope® Diagnostic System; MMDx), %dd-cfDNA, and HLA antibody testing. This report analyzes all three results.

*Methods: MMDx was assessed at ATAGC; %dd-cfDNA by Natera Inc. (Prospera); central HLA antibody testing by One Lambda Inc. LGH interpreted HLA antibody as DSA using local donor-recipient genotyping. Local standard-of-care histology and DSA were recorded. Some DSA-negative HLA-antibody (“PRA”) positive biopsies were flagged as high risk (‘DSANHR’) due to incomplete donor class II genotyping.

*Results: Central DSA was associated with elevated %dd-cfDNA: geometric mean 0.45% in DSA-negative vs. 1.28% in DSA-positive (p=3.7×10-7, using log %dd-cfDNA). Most samples called DSA-negative locally were confirmed DSA-negative centrally (113/118 (96%)). By MMDx diagnoses (Table 1; Figure 1A), 35/80 ABMR/Mixed biopsies (44%) were DSA-positive (including 6 DSANHR). Histology was similar: 29/59 ABMR/mixed DSA-positive (49%), Most DSA-negative ABMR/Mixed were sensitized: 30/45 (67%) were PRA+ve. In ABMR/mixed, 60/80 (75%) had %dd-cfDNA>1.0: 33/45 (73%) DSA-negative and 27/35 (77%) DSA-positive. Thus, high %dd-cfDNA was as frequent in DSA-negative as in DSA-positive ABMR/mixed (p=0.90). In Figure 1B, 11/22 DSA-negative ABMR with high %dd-cfDNA (67%) were PRA-positive. In logistic regression, continuous %dd-cfDNA measurements predicted ABMR/mixed better than DSA status (AIC 292.42 vs. 332.93 – smaller AICs are better). Log(%dd-cfDNA) added significantly to a model with DSA alone (p=4×10-12). DSA added significantly to cfDNA alone (p=0.008). The best predictive model for biopsy ABMR/mixed used both %dd-cfDNA and DSA together.

*Conclusions: In the first 280 triple results (central DSA, %dd-cfDNA, and biopsy MMDx), 75% of molecular ABMR/mixed biopsies had %dd-cfDNA>1.0. Only 44% of ABMR/mixed were DSA-positive. However, most DSA-negative ABMR/mixed were sensitized (67% PRA+ve). Local and central DSA-negative results were similar. Thus %dd-cfDNA is a robust feature of active ABMR, regardless of DSA status. In regression, the best prediction of ABMR activity at the time of indication biopsy includes both %dd-cfDNA and DSA.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Halloran PF, Hidalgo LG, Demko Z, Prewett A, Reeve J, Lawrence C, Lowe D, Billings P. Three-Way Comparison of Central DSA, %dd-cf DNA, and Molecular Biopsy Findings in the Trifecta Study [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2022; 22 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/three-way-comparison-of-central-dsa-%dd-cf-dna-and-molecular-biopsy-findings-in-the-trifecta-study/. Accessed May 9, 2025.

« Back to 2022 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences