ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

The Pathology of Heart Allograft Biopsies: Discrepancies in Interpretation Between Conventional Histology and the Molecular Microscope Diagnostic (MMDx®) System

P. Randhawa1, A. Seitz2, Y. Huang1, B. Feingold2

1Department of Pathology, Pittsburgh, PA, 2Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

Meeting: 2021 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: 145

Keywords: Biopsy, Heart transplant patients, Histology

Topic: Clinical Science » Heart » Heart and VADs: All Topics

Session Information

Session Name: Do's and Don'ts of Heart Transplant Care

Session Type: Rapid Fire Oral Abstract

Date: Sunday, June 6, 2021

Session Time: 4:30pm-5:30pm

 Presentation Time: 4:45pm-4:50pm

Location: Virtual

*Purpose: There is growing interest in using transcriptomics to complement histologic evaluation of allograft hearts. The present study scrutinizes discrepancies between histologic and MMDx® systems and provides a logical framework to understand the underlying reasons.

*Methods: Sixty-two allograft biopsies from 22 pediatric HT recipients were clinically graded using the International Society of Heart Transplantation (ISHLT) 2005 criteria. Grade 1R biopsies were further subcategorized into grades 1A, 1B and 2, and grade 2R biopsies into grade 3A and higher, using ISHLT 1990 criteria. Antibody mediated injury was graded as pAMR (0), pAMR (1h+), pAMR (1i+) and pAMR (2). Typically, 2 fragments of tissue from each biopsy were sent for MMDx® analysis by clinical protocol among recipients with clinical concern for rejection (symptoms, new graft dysfunction, increase in DSA, or immediate prior biopsy ≥1B and/or pAMR1h+ or pAMR2-3. Histologic and gene expression findings were correlated and compared with the clinical parameters.

*Results: All biopsies without histologic evidence of TCMR and ABMR were also characterized as such by MMDx® (n = 30). MMDx® reported no TCMR in 15/15 biopsies with ISHLT grade 1A and 10/12 grade 1B TCMR (see Table) . The single grade 2 TCMR biopsy in our dataset was interpreted as molecular TCMR. Amongst the 4 biopsies with grade 3A TCMR, 2 were classified as molecular TCMR, one as molecular mixed ABMR/TCMR, and one with neither TCMR nor ABMR. Amongst 36 biopsies with pAMR (0), 8 were classified as molecular ABMR and all patients had concurrent circulating DSA, despite the negative C4d staining. Among biopsies graded pAMR 1h+, 11/18 had molecular findings interpreted as ABMR. MMDx® did not classify ABMR in 5 biopsies (two patients) with pAMR 2 histology, including one with diffuse C4d staining and circulating DSA. However, these biopsies were classified as showing severe injury phenotype.

*Conclusions: In this pediatric HTx cohort, MMDx® did not identify TCMR in biopsies with grade 1A, most grade 1B, and occasional grade 2 or 3A rejection. This may reflect lower sensitivity, an arbitrary threshold setting for molecular diagnosis, or misclassification by histologic grading. Detection of ABMR by MMDx® on biopsies graded pAMR0 with circulating DSA highlights the challenges of histology-based diagnosis of ABMR. While these diagnostic discrepancies demonstrate the need for further investigation, they may also suggest that histology and molecular analyses have complementary roles.

Comparison of Histologic and MMDX Diagnoses
# MMDX TCMR MMDX AMR Histologic TCMR Histologic AMR
Grade 1A 15 0 0 15 0
Grade 1B 12 2 0 12 0
Grade 2 1 0 1 1 0
Grade 3A 4 2 1 4 0
pAMR 0 36 1 8 11 0
pAMR 1h+ 18 2 11 16 18
pAMR 2 5 0 0 1 5
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Randhawa P, Seitz A, Huang Y, Feingold B. The Pathology of Heart Allograft Biopsies: Discrepancies in Interpretation Between Conventional Histology and the Molecular Microscope Diagnostic (MMDx®) System [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2021; 21 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/the-pathology-of-heart-allograft-biopsies-discrepancies-in-interpretation-between-conventional-histology-and-the-molecular-microscope-diagnostic-mmdx-system/. Accessed May 9, 2025.

« Back to 2021 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences