Side Effect Profile of Everolimus in Liver Transplant Patients
Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit.
Meeting: 2018 American Transplant Congress
Abstract number: C208
Keywords: Adverse effects, Liver transplantation, Renal function
Session Information
Session Name: Poster Session C: Liver: Immunosuppression and Rejection
Session Type: Poster Session
Date: Monday, June 4, 2018
Session Time: 6:00pm-7:00pm
Presentation Time: 6:00pm-7:00pm
Location: Hall 4EF
Introduction
Use of calcineurin inhibitors has been the mainstay of antirejection medications after liver transplant (LT). However, renal toxicity from these drugs remains troublesome. By comparison, mTOR inhibitors tend to have better renal tolerance. Yet, prior studies (PROTECT trial) have shown that the overall side effect (SE) profile of everolimus (EVL) leads to adverse effects in 63.4% of patients, requiring discontinuation in many instances. We looked to explore the tolerance of EVL in LT patients.
Methods
All patients receiving a LT between 2011 and 2014 treated with EVL for renal dysfunction were evaluated for SE profile. Information including age, gender, race, BMI, history of pre-transplant renal disease, details of SEs, dose changes, severe infection meeting sepsis criteria, rejection events, lipid profile and general lab data were also included. Statistics were calculated using ANOVA, t-test and Chi-squared tests in R 3.4.2.
Results
Total of 75 patients were analyzed. 43 (57.3%) experienced SEs with 31 (41.3%) discontinuing EVL. GI symptoms were the most common: mucosal ulceration (n=7, 9.3%), nausea (n=4, 5.3%), vomiting (n=3, 4%), diarrhea (n=6, 8%), and severe colitis (n=2, 2.7%). Two patients (2.7%) experienced significant weight loss, despite only one (1.3%) reporting loss of appetite. Three patients (4%) developed diabetes after starting EVL. Nonspecific complaints such as headaches (n=2, 2.7%), edema (n=11, 14.7%), pruritus (n=7, 9.3%), malaise (n=3, 4%) were noted in nearly a quarter of patients (n=18, 24%). 13 patients (17.3%) had documented rejection on EVL therapy.
Table 1 | Tolerated SE | Not Tolerated | |
Sex (n) | Male | 11 | 25 |
Female | 8 | 6 | |
Race (n) | White | 14 | 25 |
Black | 3 | 7 | |
Other | 2 | 1 | |
Age (mean +/_ sd) | 59.2+/-7.2 | 60.9+/-7.6 | |
eGFR | Pre | 65.5 +/-22.3 | 63.0+/=34.5 |
6 mo | 62.9+/-19.6 | 67.5+/-29.5 | |
12 mo | 60.7+/-21.8 | 64.7+/-34.1 | |
18 mo | 66.1+/-24.5 | 66.0+/-27.8 | |
24 mo | 58.7+/-19.7 | 65.0+/-27.3 |
Discussion
EVL was poorly tolerated in LT patients with discontinuation rates greater than 40% in our urban population. The SEs leading to discontinuation were of a wide range making future interventions to prevent these SEs difficult. Efficacy of therapy was not clearly demonstrated in this population given similar eGFR among those who continued or discontinued therapy, respectively.
CITATION INFORMATION: Kumssa F., Sadiq O., Alimirah M., Kaur R., Patel A., Jafri S-.M. Side Effect Profile of Everolimus in Liver Transplant Patients Am J Transplant. 2017;17 (suppl 3).
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Kumssa F, Sadiq O, Alimirah M, Kaur R, Patel A, Jafri S-M. Side Effect Profile of Everolimus in Liver Transplant Patients [abstract]. https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/side-effect-profile-of-everolimus-in-liver-transplant-patients/. Accessed November 21, 2024.« Back to 2018 American Transplant Congress