ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Role of Serial Donor Derived Cell-Free DNA Monitoring in Kidney Transplant Recipients

A. X. Wang, C. R. Lenihan

Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA

Meeting: 2021 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: 893

Keywords: Biopsy, Graft function, Monitoring, Rejection

Topic: Clinical Science » Kidney » Kidney: Acute Cellular Rejection

Session Information

Session Name: Kidney: Acute Cellular Rejection

Session Type: Poster Abstract

Session Date & Time: None. Available on demand.

Location: Virtual

*Purpose: Donor derived cell-free DNA (dd cf-DNA; Allosure, CareDx) is increasingly employed for non-invasive kidney transplant monitoring. The goal of this study was 1) to examine the association between dd cf-DNA and for-cause biopsy findings and 2) describe changes in dd cf-DNA and creatinine following rejection treatment.

*Methods: We included patients who 1) received a kidney transplant between May 2017 and July 2020 at our center, 2) underwent for-cause kidney transplant biopsy, 3) had ≥ 1 dd cf-DNA prior to biopsy and 4) had ≥ 2 dd cf-DNA levels measured during the entire study period. Patient demographic and clinical data were abstracted from medical records.

*Results: 41 patients were stratified into 4 groups based on their most recent pre-biopsy dd cf-DNA: >1.0% (Group 1), 0.50-0.99% (Group 2), 0.21-0.49% (Group 3), and <0.21% (Group 4). Baseline characteristics are shown in table 1. The prevalence of rejection was greatest in the highest dd cf-DNA stratum (Group 1) and decreased across the 4 dd cf-DNA strata (table 2). Severe rejection (per Banff Criteria) was seen more frequently in Group 1. Only 1 patient (out of 11) in the lowest dd cf-DNA stratum (Group 4) had rejection and that was a ‘borderline’ T cell mediated rejection diagnosed on a background of prominent tubular injury and delayed graft function. Nearly all patients had a decrease in dd cf-DNA after treatment of rejection. Post-rejection decrease in creatinine (measured at the same time as dd cf-DNA) was less pronounced (figure 1).

*Conclusions: Our study suggests that kidney transplant recipients with low dd cf-DNA (<0.21%) who undergo for-cause biopsy are unlikely to have rejection. Monitoring of dd cf-DNA may prove useful in assessing response to rejection treatment.

Table 1
Group 1: dd cf-DNA >1.0%
(N = 12)
Group 2: dd cf-DNA 0.50-0.99% (N=7) Group 3: dd cf-DNA 0.21-0.49% (N=11) Group 4: dd cf-DNA<0.21% (N=11)
Median dd cf-DNA (IQR) 1.85 (1.25 – 2.93) 0.90 (0.83 – 0.97) 0.38 (0.26 – 0.43) 0.15 (0.13 – 0.18)
Median Cr (IQR) 1.45 (1.14 – 2.37) 1.56 (1.02 – 1.83) 1.76 (1.45 – 2.54) 1.43 (1.11 – 1.99)
Median cPRA % (IQR) 89 (30 – 100) 75 (6 – 97) 69 (27 – 99) 45 (0 – 89)
Median HLA Mismatch #/14 (IQR) 8 (6 – 11) 6 (6 – 11) 8 (5 – 11) 8 (7 – 9)
Living donor (%) 5 (35.7) 3 (42.9) 1 (9.1) 2 (18.2)
Median KDPI % (IQR) 28 (22 – 32) 39 (21 – 69) 49 (20 – 71) 41 (10 – 69)
Median days between dd cf-DNA and biopsy (IQR) 18 (1 – 43) 16 (10 – 53) 5 (4 – 22) 32 (8 – 92)
Table 2
Group 1: dd cf-DNA >1.0% (N=12) Group 2: dd cf-DNA 0.50-0.99% (N=7) Group 3: dd cf-DNA 0.21-0.49% (N=11) Group 4: dd cf-DNA <0.21% (N=11) P-Value
All rejections (%) 9 (75.0) 5 (71.4) 5 (45.5) 1 (9.1) 0.008
Rejections excluding borderline (%) 6 (50.0) 2 (28.6) 2 (18.2) 0 0.04
All TCMR 8 5 5 1
Borderline TCMR 2 3 3 1
ABMR (*including mixed rejections) 3* 2* 0 0
% Change in dd cf-DNA after treatment -63.3 -67.4 -50.0 0
% Change in Cr after treatment +6.7 -4.5 -9.6 0

 border=

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Wang AX, Lenihan CR. Role of Serial Donor Derived Cell-Free DNA Monitoring in Kidney Transplant Recipients [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2021; 21 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/role-of-serial-donor-derived-cell-free-dna-monitoring-in-kidney-transplant-recipients/. Accessed June 1, 2025.

« Back to 2021 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences