Post-Kidney Transplant Valacyclovir versus Valganciclovir for CMV Prophylaxis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
P. S. Verghese1, A. Matas2, S. Chinnakotla2, M. Evans3, H. Balfour Jr4
1Univ of Minnesota Pediatric Nephrology, Minneapolis, MN, 2Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, 3Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 4Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Meeting: 2022 American Transplant Congress
Abstract number: 51
Keywords: Kidney transplantation, Neutropenia, Safety, Viral therapy
Topic: Clinical Science » Infection Disease » 24 - All Infections (Excluding Kidney & Viral Hepatitis)
Session Information
Session Name: Cytomegalovirus and other Herpes Viruses
Session Type: Rapid Fire Oral Abstract
Date: Sunday, June 5, 2022
Session Time: 3:30pm-5:00pm
Presentation Time: 3:40pm-3:50pm
Location: Hynes Ballroom B
*Purpose: Valganciclovir (valG) is an effective CMV prophylactic agent post-kidney transplant (KTx) with significant side effects. Valacyclovir (valA) may be effective for CMV prophylaxis with improved tolerability in adult and pediatric kidney recipients.
*Methods: In this randomized, open-label trial [NCT01329185], we randomly assigned adult and pediatric KTx recipients (1:1) to valA or valG for CMV prophylaxis post-KTx, in blocks of 2 and 4. Dose was based on estimated GFR and age [as per package insert] and duration on donor-recipient serostatus. Patient outcomes were assessed [Table]. The primary end point was incidence of side-effect related study drug reduction/cessation and the secondary outcome was incidence of CMV viremia / disease.
*Results: Thirty % of the patients were pediatric and 40% female. Patients receiving valA (n=66) and valG (n=71) were similar [Table 4]. Patients were significantly more likely to have a reduction of study drug due to side effects in the valG arm (21%) than valA (2%) (p = 0.0003) with no significant difference in incidence of CMV viremia / disease. The most common reason for valG dose reduction was leucopenia; incidence of leucopenia requiring an intervention such as Filgrastim was significantly higher in valG (25% in valG vs 5% in valA: p=0.0007). There was no significant difference in incidence (p=0.37); time to CMV viremia (p = 0.2); or area under CMV viral load time curve (p=0.2). Sub-analysis of patients that were CMV antibody D+R- demonstrated similar results.
*Conclusions: ValA is as effective as valG in preventing CMV infection post-KTx in adults and children with significantly less dose-limiting side effects.
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Verghese PS, Matas A, Chinnakotla S, Evans M, Jr HBalfour. Post-Kidney Transplant Valacyclovir versus Valganciclovir for CMV Prophylaxis: A Randomized Controlled Trial [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2022; 22 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/post-kidney-transplant-valacyclovir-versus-valganciclovir-for-cmv-prophylaxis-a-randomized-controlled-trial/. Accessed December 3, 2024.« Back to 2022 American Transplant Congress