ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Not All Cellular Rejections Are the Same: Differences in Early and Late Hepatic Allograft Rejection.

C. Jadlowiec, P. Morgan, A. Nehra, M. Hathcock, W. Kremers, R. Wiesner, T. Taner.

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Meeting: 2017 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: 523

Keywords: Graft survival, Liver transplantation, Rejection

Session Information

Session Name: Concurrent Session: Liver: Immunosuppression and Rejection

Session Type: Concurrent Session

Date: Tuesday, May 2, 2017

Session Time: 4:30pm-6:00pm

 Presentation Time: 4:30pm-4:42pm

Location: E451b

While acute cellular rejection (ACR) after liver transplantation (LT) is not thought to cause long-term graft injury and inferior outcomes, this notion has been challenged recently. In order to investigate this in more detail, we examined the effect of biopsy-proven ACR in a large cohort of LT recipients with protocol biopsies maintained on standardized immunosuppression.

Methods: 787 adult LT recipients from 2000 to 2010 were identified, and their data collected. Protocol biopsies were done in all patients within 6 weeks of LT. Additional indication-specific biopsies were done when allograft dysfunction was suspected. A total of 2,870 biopsies were reviewed. All patients received methylprednisolone for induction and standardized triple immunosuppression (mycophenolate, tacrolimus and prednisone) for maintenance therapy. The median follow-up was 8.3 years. Early rejections (≤6 weeks) were analyzed using chi-square and unequal variance t-tests. Late rejections (>6 weeks) and long term survival were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models.

Results: Early ACR occurred in 292 (37.1%) LT recipients, and had no effect on long-term graft- (HR 0.99; 95%CI 0.77-1.29; p=0.98) or patient survival (HR 0.97; 95%CI 0.74-1.27; p=0.84). Variables associated with early ACR included younger recipient age (p=0.001), female sex (p=0.035), HLA mismatch (p=0.005) and donor type (deceased vs. living) (p=0.011). Patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and acute fulminant liver failure (ALF) demonstrated a propensity for early ACR (p=0.028). Patients with a late ACR had an increased risk of graft failure within 90 days of the rejection (HR 5.40; 95% CI 2.92-9.99; p<0.001). While this risk decreased over time, late ACR continued to confer a higher risk of graft failure after the initial 90 days (HR 1.48; 95% CI 1.05-2.08; p=0.024). Similarly, late ACR was associated with increased risk of death within 90 days of the rejection (HR 2.903; 95% CI 1.23 – 6.86; p=0.0152). Non-Caucasian race was associated with late ACR (HR 2.04, 95%CI 1.31-3.21; p=0.001). Patients with AIH, PBC and ALF continued to demonstrate a propensity for late ACR.

Conclusions: Based on protocol biopsies, these results confirm earlier observations and suggest that early ACR following LT does not negatively impact patient or graft survival when treated. By contrast, late ACR occurring more than 6 weeks from LT is associated with decreased patient survival and an increased risk of graft loss.

CITATION INFORMATION: Jadlowiec C, Morgan P, Nehra A, Hathcock M, Kremers W, Wiesner R, Taner T. Not All Cellular Rejections Are the Same: Differences in Early and Late Hepatic Allograft Rejection. Am J Transplant. 2017;17 (suppl 3).

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Jadlowiec C, Morgan P, Nehra A, Hathcock M, Kremers W, Wiesner R, Taner T. Not All Cellular Rejections Are the Same: Differences in Early and Late Hepatic Allograft Rejection. [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2017; 17 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/not-all-cellular-rejections-are-the-same-differences-in-early-and-late-hepatic-allograft-rejection/. Accessed May 18, 2025.

« Back to 2017 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences