ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Analysis of Local versus Imported Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD) Kidneys: A Single Center Experience with 497 ECD Kidney Transplants.

M. Khan,1 H. El-Hennawy,1 A. Farney,1 J. Rogers,1 G. Orlando,1 A. Reeves-Daniel,2 A. Palanisamy,2 M. Gautreaux,3 S. Iskandar,3 W. Doares,4 S. Kaczmorski,4 R. Stratta.1

1Surgery, Wake Forest, Winston-Salem, NC
2Internal Medicine, Wake Forest, Winston-Salem, NC
3Pathology, Wake Forest, Winston-Salem, NC
4Pharmacy, Wake Forest, Winston-Salem, NC.

Meeting: 2016 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: 561

Keywords: Donors, Graft function, Graft survival, marginal, Outcome

Session Information

Session Name: Concurrent Session: The High KDPI Kidney: Outcomes and Optimal Utilization

Session Type: Concurrent Session

Date: Tuesday, June 14, 2016

Session Time: 4:30pm-6:00pm

 Presentation Time: 4:54pm-5:06pm

Location: Ballroom C

With the new Kidney Allocation System, broader sharing of expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys may occur, which may influence discard rates and survival outcomes. To better understand the benefits and risks of importing ECD kidneys, we retrospectively reviewed our single center experience with ECD kidney transplants (KT) according to donor location. Methods: All patients (pts) received depleting antibody induction with FK/MPA ± steroids. Standardized management algorithms were implemented to preserve nephron function (including machine preservation) and pt selection was based on low immunologic risk, older age and predicted limited nephron need. Results: Over a 12.8 year period, we performed 497 ECD KTs including 247 local and 250 imported from other donor service areas. The import ECD group had more donors (16% vs 8.5%) and recipients (23% vs 16%) ≥ age 70, more zero HLA-mismatches (14% vs 2%), more pts with a PRA >20% (17% vs 9%), more KTs with a cold ischemia time >30 hours (46% vs 19%), fewer DCD/ECDs (5% vs 9%), higher pump resistance (mean 0.27 vs 0.20 mm Hg/ml/min) and fewer kidneys managed with pump preservation (78% vs 92%, all p ≤ 0.05) compared to the local ECD group. The 2 groups were comparable in terms of other characteristics such as donor renal function and cause of death, donor and recipient gender and ethnicity, dialysis modality, waiting time, kidney laterality, as well as proportion of dual KTs (10% import vs 12% local) and retransplants (6% import vs 3% local). 271 pts (54.5%) had at least 5 years follow-up. With mean follow-up of 55 months, actual pt and graft survival rates were 71% and 57.6% in import vs 76% and 57.9% in local ECD KTs, respectively. Death-censored graft survival rates were 70% in import vs 69% in local ECD KTs. Delayed graft function occurred in 28% import vs 23% (p=NS) local ECD KTs. There were no differences in other outcomes. 1- and 2-year renal function (eGFR 42 ml/min/1.73 m2) was similar in both groups. Conclusions: Mid-term outcomes are similar for import vs local ECD KTs, suggesting that broader sharing of ECD kidneys may improve utilization without compromising outcomes.

CITATION INFORMATION: Khan M, El-Hennawy H, Farney A, Rogers J, Orlando G, Reeves-Daniel A, Palanisamy A, Gautreaux M, Iskandar S, Doares W, Kaczmorski S, Stratta R. Analysis of Local versus Imported Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD) Kidneys: A Single Center Experience with 497 ECD Kidney Transplants. Am J Transplant. 2016;16 (suppl 3).

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Khan M, El-Hennawy H, Farney A, Rogers J, Orlando G, Reeves-Daniel A, Palanisamy A, Gautreaux M, Iskandar S, Doares W, Kaczmorski S, Stratta R. Analysis of Local versus Imported Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD) Kidneys: A Single Center Experience with 497 ECD Kidney Transplants. [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2016; 16 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/analysis-of-local-versus-imported-expanded-criteria-donor-ecd-kidneys-a-single-center-experience-with-497-ecd-kidney-transplants/. Accessed May 21, 2025.

« Back to 2016 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences