ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

A National Survey of Immunosuppression Strategies in Intestinal Transplantation

M. Segovia1, T. Beduschi2, J. Boike3, D. Farmer4, S. Horslen5, K. Iyer6, S. Jafri7, A. Langnas8, C. Matsumoto9, A. Mavis1, G. Mazariegos10, S. Nagai7, J. O'Leary11, Y. Patel1, D. Sudan1, N. Sulejmani7, B. Summers7, T. Schiano6

1Duke, Durham, NC, 2Univ Miami, Miami, FL, 3NWU, Chicago, IL, 4UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 5Seattle Child, Seattle, WA, 6Mt Sinai, NY, NY, 7Henry Ford, Detroit, MI, 8UNMC, Omaha, NE, 9Georgetown, Washington, DC, 10UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, 11Dallas VAMC, Dallas, TX

Meeting: 2019 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: 519

Keywords: HLA antibodies, Immunosuppression, Intestinal transplantation, Rejection

Session Information

Session Name: Concurrent Session: Small Bowel

Session Type: Concurrent Session

Date: Tuesday, June 4, 2019

Session Time: 2:30pm-4:00pm

 Presentation Time: 3:18pm-3:30pm

Location: Room 209

*Purpose: Review the management of immunosuppression (IS) for intestinal transplantation (IT) in the USA

*Methods: A survey was created and sent via email to surgical directors of centers performing at least 10 IT total over the last 3 years. We asked about human leukocyte antigen (HLA) testing, desensitization, IS and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR)

*Results: 8/10 centers responded. All perform routine HLA donor specific antibody (DSA) testing pre-IT. 37.5% check DSA titers only after infections or transfusions. 62.5% centers transplant through a positive type I DSA crossmatch (some, regardless of MFI titers) while only 37.5% do so with type II DSA crossmatch. In patients with pre-IT DSA, all centers perform follow up testing post-IT, usually every 1-2 weeks. 87.5% do this for those without pre-IT DSA. 50% centers perform pre-IT desensitization for isolated IT and 25% for multivisceral transplants with combinations of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), rituximab, bortezomib or plasmapheresis. 87.5% centers use induction with antithymocyte globulin (ATG). Post-IT, the standard maintenance IS regimen is tacrolimus (FK) and steroids with 25% also using mycophenolate mofetil and 37.5% using an mTor inhibitor. Goal FK level is 10-15 ng/mL in the first 3 months and <10ng/mL beyond 1 year. If a desired level is not achieved, 50% centers use a sublingual (SL) formulation; 12.5% use neither a SL nor intravenous formulation. 75% centers run IS lower with a liver-containing graft. 75% centers perform protocol intestinal biopsies in the absence of symptoms, mostly weekly for the first 3 months post-IT. All centers diagnose AMR with one or more of the following criteria: refractory rejection, increase in DSA titers, C4d staining in tissue or histologic findings. Therapy is performed with plasmapheresis, IVIg, rituximab or steroids. Only 1 center uses bortezomib and none use ATG. When treating moderate/severe acute cellular rejection, the most commonly used agent is ATG (87.5%).

*Conclusions: All centers perform routine HLA DSA testing before IT; the majority check titers pre-IT every 3-6 months. Most centers transplant through a positive type I but not type II DSA crossmatch. Desensitization is mostly performed in isolated IT and when the panel-reactive antibody (PRA) is >70%. While most centers have similar practices for pre-IT DSA testing, transplanting through a positive crossmatch, induction and post-IT IS, there are several different strategies for desensitization and for the diagnosis/therapy of AMR. Formal protocols for desensitization and diagnosis/management of presumed AMR should thus be pursued across centers.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Segovia M, Beduschi T, Boike J, Farmer D, Horslen S, Iyer K, Jafri S, Langnas A, Matsumoto C, Mavis A, Mazariegos G, Nagai S, O'Leary J, Patel Y, Sudan D, Sulejmani N, Summers B, Schiano T. A National Survey of Immunosuppression Strategies in Intestinal Transplantation [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2019; 19 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/a-national-survey-of-immunosuppression-strategies-in-intestinal-transplantation/. Accessed May 8, 2025.

« Back to 2019 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences