Genetic versus Self-reported African Ancestry and Kidney Allograft Outcome: Analysis of Two Large Multiethnic Urban Transplant Cohorts
1Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, New York, NY, 2Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Meeting: 2021 American Transplant Congress
Abstract number: 1288
Keywords: African-American, Genomic markers, Kidney transplantation, Outcome
Topic: Clinical Science » Organ Inclusive » Non-Organ Specific: Disparities to Outcome and Access to Healthcare
Session Information
Session Name: Non-Organ Specific: Disparities to Outcome and Access to Healthcare
Session Type: Poster Abstract
Session Date & Time: None. Available on demand.
Location: Virtual
*Purpose: African-American (AA) kidney transplant recipients (KTx) have higher risk of rejection and failure. However, it is unknown to what extent the inferior outcomes in self-reported AAs are due to genetic versus environmental effects. Herein, we compared the effects of self-reported race versus genetic African admixture on graft outcomes.
*Methods: A discovery multiethnic cohort of 1,083 KTx from Columbia University and a replication cohort of 761 kidney transplant recipients from University of Pennsylvania were genotyped with high resolution SNP arrays. African admixture proportions (AFR), a genetically-derived quantitative measure of African ancestry, was estimated with ADMIXTURE software. US census tract variables matched with participants’ geocoded addresses were used to analyze the effect of neighborhood socio-economic status (SES) factors. Multivariable Cox models were used to investigate associations between African ancestry measures and time to biopsy-proven rejection and time to death-censored graft failure, with adjustments for relevant covariates. Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to compare the models. Meta-analyses of the results in the two cohorts were computed using random-effect models.
*Results: 206 and 346 self-identified AA were included in the discovery and replication cohorts, respectively. Over a median time of 78 months, 432 patients had rejection and 193 had graft failure in the discovery cohort; during a median time of 49 months, 113 patients had rejection and 121 had failure in the replication cohort. In the discovery and replication cohorts self-reported AA ancestry and AFR were associated with acute rejection and graft failure (Figure 1). AIC values show that AFR is non-inferior or slightly better predictor than self-reported AA. The HR for measures of ancestry only mildly decreased when adjusting for SES factors in both cohorts. Meta-analyses of the results confirmed that self-reported AA and AFR were associated with rejection and failure independently of clinical covariates and SES.
*Conclusions: In conclusion, self-reported AA race and a genetically-derived continuous measure of African ancestry predict the risk of allograft rejection and failure in multiethnic and genetically diverse cohorts. A composite variable for US census-derived neighborhood SES did not confound the association between ancestry and either rejection or failure.
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Zanoni F, Neugut D, Mohan S, Gharavi A, Keating B, Kiryluk K. Genetic versus Self-reported African Ancestry and Kidney Allograft Outcome: Analysis of Two Large Multiethnic Urban Transplant Cohorts [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2021; 21 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/genetic-versus-self-reported-african-ancestry-and-kidney-allograft-outcome-analysis-of-two-large-multiethnic-urban-transplant-cohorts/. Accessed November 22, 2024.« Back to 2021 American Transplant Congress