ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Gene Expression Signatures Associated with Antibody-Mediated Rejection (ABMR) in Renal Allograft Biopsies (Bx) Are Beneficial to Clarifying ABMR Activity in Ambivalent Cases

H. Zhang1, C. C. Nast2, N. Ammerman3, A. A. Vo3, I. Gallegos3, M. Arevalo3, S. C. Jordan3, M. Toyoda1

1Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 3Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

Meeting: 2020 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: 248

Keywords: Biopsy, Gene expression, Kidney transplantation, Rejection

Session Information

Session Name: Kidney Chronic Antibody Mediated Rejection

Session Type: Oral Abstract Session

Date: Saturday, May 30, 2020

Session Time: 3:15pm-4:45pm

 Presentation Time: 4:15pm-4:27pm

Location: Virtual

*Purpose: “Thoroughly validated gene transcripts” in renal Bx was adopted as one of the criteria for ABMR diagnosis in the latest Banff classification. Here, we assessed possible ABMR activity in Bx whose pathology findings did not meet the current Banff criteria for either active or chronic active ABMR, using gene expression signatures associated with ABMR, identified in Bx with definitive pathology diagnosis.

*Methods: Total RNA was extracted from Bx for reverse transcription, pre-amplification and qPCR to measure mRNA transcript levels of various genes. 4 genes (KLRF1, SH2D1B, CCL3, CCL4) with the most significant association with ABMR were identified from 66 Bx (30 ABMR, 15 T-cell-mediated rejection [CMR], 10 ABMR+CMR, and 11 no rejection controls) excluding chronic ABMR, suspicious ABMR or borderline CMR cases. ABMR gene score (GS) was calculated based on the mRNA transcript levels of these 4 genes. The ABMR GS was evaluated for 16 Bx which were suspicious for ABMR but did not meet the current Banff criteria for any type of ABMR (Table 1), and also for 12 Bx meeting the current Banff criteria of chronic ABMR but not chronic active ABMR.

*Results: Based on the discovery set of 66 Bx, an ABMR GS of 0.43 and above was set for the diagnosis of active ABMR (AUC: 0.897, sensitivity: 0.850, specificity: 0.846). Of the 16 Bx suspicious for ABMR, 15 (94%) had ABMR GS above 0.43 (1.20±0.54) and 1 was 0.39. Of the 15 Bx with ABMR GS above 0.43, 6 (40%) had additional Bx-proven active or chronic active ABMR within 1 year before or after each Bx. Of the 12 chronic ABMR Bx, 6 (50%) had ABMR GS above 0.43 (1.47±0.55), and 6 were below 0.43 (0.20±0.09); microvascular inflammation (MVI: g+ptc) was not different between these two subgroups (p=0.88).

Table 1: Summary of 16 Bx Suspicious for ABMR
# of Bx g+ptc g C4d+ DSA+ (Borderline) CMR Others ABMR GS
10 ≥3 ≥1 No No Various N/A >0.43
1 3 1 No No Yes N/A 0.39
1 2 0 Yes Yes Yes N/A >0.43
2 ≥2 0 No Various No N/A >0.43
2 2 0 No No Yes Both Bx were from the same patient who had pre-existing DSA that was detected again along with Bx-proven active ABMR within 1 year after these 2 Bx. >0.43

*Conclusions: Our ABMR GS confirmed ABMR activity in 15 out of 16 Bx suspicious for active or chronic active ABMR. 50% of 12 chronic ABMR Bx had ABMR GS above 0.43, suggesting an active ABMR component despite the lack of pathological diagnostic features for ABMR activity. Our ABMR GS exhibited significant utility for identifying ABMR activity in renal allograft Bx with diagnostically ambivalent pathological features and may be a valuable tool in guiding therapeutic decisions.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Zhang H, Nast CC, Ammerman N, Vo AA, Gallegos I, Arevalo M, Jordan SC, Toyoda M. Gene Expression Signatures Associated with Antibody-Mediated Rejection (ABMR) in Renal Allograft Biopsies (Bx) Are Beneficial to Clarifying ABMR Activity in Ambivalent Cases [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2020; 20 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/gene-expression-signatures-associated-with-antibody-mediated-rejection-abmr-in-renal-allograft-biopsies-bx-are-beneficial-to-clarifying-abmr-activity-in-ambivalent-cases/. Accessed June 8, 2025.

« Back to 2020 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences