ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Variation in Definition of Death in Donation After Circulatory Death Policies

D. Cassidy1, M. J. Englesbe2, V. S. Valbuena2

1University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 2Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Meeting: 2022 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: 1788

Keywords: Donors, non-heart-beating, Ethics, Kidney transplantation, Liver transplantation

Topic: Clinical Science » Organ Inclusive » 68 - Deceased Donor Management and Intervention Research

Session Information

Session Name: Deceased Donor Management and Intervention Research

Session Type: Poster Abstract

Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2022

Session Time: 7:00pm-8:00pm

 Presentation Time: 7:00pm-8:00pm

Location: Hynes Halls C & D

*Purpose: Organ transplantation operates through a shared network requiring organizations, hospitals, and individuals to work towards a common goal. However, the policies that govern each organization that affect the shared organ supply may differ. Donation after circulatory death (DCD) protocols are one example of a common policy that has been created and shared, yet variation exists among them. In this study, we set to analyze the language used by DCD policies to define death in DCD donation to investigate variation in practice in a single state.

*Methods: We conducted an analysis of individual hospital DCD policies within the state of Michigan. We examined the policies for their differences and similarities across protocols. We hypothesized there would be institutional variance in the definition of death, the provider who can declare death, and the maximum wait time for the donor to expire after extubation until organ recovery is no longer pursued.

*Results: Fifty policies were included in our analysis. Most hospitals (94% n=47) required a physician to declare death in DCD and this physician must be separate from the recovering surgical team. Twenty-two policies (44%) note that physician designees, which may include residents, RNs and other team members, are permitted to declare death. The minutes to expire ranged from 60 to 120 minutes, with the majority of (44%, n=22) hospitals setting the maximum time to expire at 90 minutes. There was significant variation in how each hospital defined death, however, consistent themes were asystole, pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and ventricular fibrillation. The most common definition included asystole. Eight hospitals did not clearly define the declaration of death.

*Conclusions: National recommendations define death in DCD recoveries as PEA, however, there is wide variation in the interpretation of these recommendations. Guidance from varied DCD policies to wait for asystole may cause delays in organ recovery. The difference between PEA and asystole may result in time lost and organs becoming nonviable. Standard policies and increased education to physicians and designees that declare death in DCD recoveries are vital as the surgical team cannot communicate with the declaring providers during the DCD recovery. Lack of standardization may result in less trust among institutions that recover and receive organs, more room for error for traveling transplant surgeons in recovery operations, and inconsistencies in DCD data.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Cassidy D, Englesbe MJ, Valbuena VS. Variation in Definition of Death in Donation After Circulatory Death Policies [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2022; 22 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/variation-in-definition-of-death-in-donation-after-circulatory-death-policies/. Accessed June 7, 2025.

« Back to 2022 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences