Validating Outcomes Reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network for Deceased Donor Kidney Recipients
1Lankenau Hospital, Philadelphia
2Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven
3Wayne State University, Detroit
4Barnabas Health, Livingston, NJ
5University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
6Western University, Ontario, Canada
7University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Meeting: 2015 American Transplant Congress
Abstract number: C52
Keywords: Cadaveric organs, Graft function, Kidney transplantation, Outcome
Session Information
Session Name: Poster Session C: ECD/DCD/high KDPI
Session Type: Poster Session
Date: Monday, May 4, 2015
Session Time: 5:30pm-6:30pm
Presentation Time: 5:30pm-6:30pm
Location: Exhibit Hall E
Data reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) is used in kidney transplant research, quality metrics and in policy development, but the accuracy of post-transplant outcomes measures is unknown. In this study, we compared post-transplant outcomes such as, delayed graft function (DGF, defined as dialysis in the first week of transplantation), post-transplant serum creatinine and acute rejection reported to OPTN to data collected for the Deceased Donor Study – a prospective cohort study at 5 kidney transplant centers. From 2012 to 2014, research coordinators (not involved in administrative operations related to OPTN) manually abstracted outcomes data from charts of 555 deceased donor kidney transplant recipients. Using Deceased Donor Study as the gold standard, we found that the sensitivity and specificity for DGF in OPTN data was 89% and 98% respectively. Serum creatinine values at 6-months in DDS and OPTN had high concordance (Lin's correlation 0.91). In contrast, for acute rejection by six months, the OPTN data recorded rejection in only 22/43 instances (49% sensitivity; 99.5% specificity). In conclusion, these results suggest that contemporary OPTN outcomes data for deceased donor kidney transplant recipients have high validity for DGF and 6-month serum creatinine, but rejection rates are under-reported.
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Potluri V, Parikh C, Hall I, Ficek J, Doshi M, Butrymowicz I, Weng F, Schröppel B, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Reese P. Validating Outcomes Reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network for Deceased Donor Kidney Recipients [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2015; 15 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/validating-outcomes-reported-to-the-organ-procurement-and-transplantation-network-for-deceased-donor-kidney-recipients/. Accessed November 21, 2024.« Back to 2015 American Transplant Congress