To Accept or Not Accept, That Is the Question: Donor Heart Selection Process and Outcome of Discarded Organs Transplanted in Another Center.
1Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
2Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
3Eurotransplant Foundation, Leiden, Netherlands
Meeting: 2017 American Transplant Congress
Abstract number: 33
Session Information
Session Name: Concurrent Session: Heart Waitlist and Allocation: Working to Get It Right
Session Type: Concurrent Session
Date: Sunday, April 30, 2017
Session Time: 2:30pm-4:00pm
Presentation Time: 2:30pm-2:42pm
Location: E267
Purpose: The decision making process to accept a donor heart is very complicated, subjective and less associated with evidence based decisions. In this analysis we evaluated donor heart acceptance, reasons for rejection, alternative center acceptance and outcome over a 15 year period in a big center
MethodsAll donor heart offers reported to our center from 2001 to 2015 [N=2205] were analysed. Heart acceptance (Ac) rate and transplantation rate were calculated. Reasons for non-acceptance were divided into quality (Qu) and non-quality (nQ) reasons. Rejected Donor hearts, accepted in other centers were analysed for transplant rate and outcome (1 year & 3year survival and compared with transplant outcomes in our center.
Results: A total of 699 (31,7%) donor hearts were accepted. Of these 124 (17,7%) were rejected at time of procurement. Main causes were CAD (37%), impaired LVEF (21%), hemodynamic instability (16%), other (26%). Of those 1506 hearts not accepted primarily, 869 (39,4%) were rejected du to quality reasons (Qu: age: 20%, hypertrophy 14%, impaired LVEF 12%, hemodynamic instability 14%, virology 11%, other 20%) and 637 (28,9%) due to non-quality reasons (nQ: mismatch: 71%, capacity 14%, other 15%). 231 (26,6%) of Qu and 346 (54,3%) of nQ hearts were accepted in other centers and of these 170 (73,6%) and 303 (87,6%) were transplanted. One and three year survival post transplantation was significant different between Ac, Qu and nQ respectively (1 year: Ac: 83,7% vs. Qu: 73,5% vs nQ: 81,1%; p=0.011; 3 Year: Ac: 79,1% vs. Qu: 64,9% vs nQ: 75,8%; p<0.0001).
Conclusions: Donor hearts not accepted in our center that were transplanted in another center were associated with a higher mortality if rejected for quality reasons, whereas heart discarded for non quality reasons had similar outcome. There is a strong need for better understanding on donor heart selection.
CITATION INFORMATION: Aliabadi-Zuckermann A, Goekler J, Kaider A, Riebandt J, Moayedifar R, Osorio E, Haberl T, Laufer G, Smits J, Zuckermann A. To Accept or Not Accept, That Is the Question: Donor Heart Selection Process and Outcome of Discarded Organs Transplanted in Another Center. Am J Transplant. 2017;17 (suppl 3).
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Aliabadi-Zuckermann A, Goekler J, Kaider A, Riebandt J, Moayedifar R, Osorio E, Haberl T, Laufer G, Smits J, Zuckermann A. To Accept or Not Accept, That Is the Question: Donor Heart Selection Process and Outcome of Discarded Organs Transplanted in Another Center. [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2017; 17 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/to-accept-or-not-accept-that-is-the-question-donor-heart-selection-process-and-outcome-of-discarded-organs-transplanted-in-another-center/. Accessed November 22, 2024.« Back to 2017 American Transplant Congress