Recurrent Cytomegalovirus and the Role of Secondary Prophylaxis in Heart and Lung Transplant Recipients
S. N. Finder1, K. Harrison1, M. Morrison1, S. Rega2, I. Feurer2, C. Gorsline3, G. Satyanarayana3, S. Hamel1
1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 2Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Nashville, TN, 3Division of Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
Meeting: 2022 American Transplant Congress
Abstract number: 686
Keywords: Cytomeglovirus, Infection, Prophylaxis, Recurrence
Topic: Clinical Science » Infection Disease » 24 - All Infections (Excluding Kidney & Viral Hepatitis)
Session Information
Session Name: All Infections (Excluding Kidney & Viral Hepatitis) I
Session Type: Poster Abstract
Date: Saturday, June 4, 2022
Session Time: 5:30pm-7:00pm
Presentation Time: 5:30pm-7:00pm
Location: Hynes Halls C & D
*Purpose: This study aimed to describe the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) recurrence in heart and lung transplant recipients and the effect of secondary prophylaxis (SP) on this recurrence.
*Methods: This single-center retrospective study examined heart and lung transplant recipients from 1/2018 – 10/2020 who received treatment for CMV viremia. Patients with ganciclovir-resistant CMV were excluded. CMV recurrence-free survival and the effect of SP on CMV recurrence were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Cox proportional hazards regression evaluated the effect of SP duration on CMV recurrence.
*Results: The sample included 43 adult transplant recipients (24 heart and 19 lung) who were treated for initial CMV viremia (Table 1). Follow-up time after transplant averaged 22.7 ± 6.9 months. The CMV recurrence-free survival estimate was 75.7% at 6 months after completion of the initial CMV treatment (Figure 1). There were 10 recurrences during this 6-month time frame, with an additional 2 occurring in post-treatment months 14 and 15. Nine patients (20.9%) received no SP. Among the 34 patients (79.1%) who received SP, its duration, in weeks, was not related to recurrence-free survival (p=0.204). Whether or not persons received SP was also not related to recurrence-free survival (Figure 2, p=0.202).
*Conclusions: In this sample of heart and lung transplant recipients, SP was not related to CMV recurrence-free survival. A prospective, randomized trial is indicated to determine the utility of SP in the prevention of CMV recurrence.
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Finder SN, Harrison K, Morrison M, Rega S, Feurer I, Gorsline C, Satyanarayana G, Hamel S. Recurrent Cytomegalovirus and the Role of Secondary Prophylaxis in Heart and Lung Transplant Recipients [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2022; 22 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/recurrent-cytomegalovirus-and-the-role-of-secondary-prophylaxis-in-heart-and-lung-transplant-recipients/. Accessed November 23, 2024.« Back to 2022 American Transplant Congress