ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Outcomes of Post-Transplant Desensitization in High Immunological Risk Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients

D. Kumar, C. Song, L. Kamal, I. Moinuddin, M. Levy, C. Bhati, A. King, P. Kimball, G. Gupta

Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA

Meeting: 2020 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: D-096

Keywords: Flowcytometry crossmatching, Highly-sensitized, Kidney transplantation

Session Information

Session Name: Poster Session D: Kidney Immunosuppression: Desensitization

Session Type: Poster Session

Date: Saturday, May 30, 2020

Session Time: 3:15pm-4:00pm

 Presentation Time: 3:30pm-4:00pm

Location: Virtual

*Purpose: The kidney allocation system (KAS) was changed in 2015 to increase access to transplants for highly sensitized patients. However, recent data suggests that even in the post-KAS era patents with a cPRA>99% continue to have very limited access to transplant. The peri-operative desensitization protocol previously published by our center for positive flow-cytometric crossmatch (FXM) in deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) recipients with plasmapheresis (PLEX) and low-dose IVIg resulted in reasonable long-term outcomes. Here we present our single-center data encompassing a predominantly African-American population from the post-KAS era on peri-operative desensitization with incorporation of a simple point-based algorithm and surveillance biopsies to evaluate for subclinical rejection.

*Methods: We retrospectively looked at outcomes of all patients with a cPRA> 80% who underwent a DDKT and were part of our high risk surveillance biopsy protocol (N=53). Of these, we selected patients for desensitization based on 4 readily available factors including cPRA > 80%, re-transplant status, T and/or B cell FXM match > 100 median channel shifts (MCS) and pre-formed DSA > 4000 MFI. If patients met ≥3 of these criteria they started immediate post-operative desensitization with 6 sessions of PLEX and IVIg (N=19).

*Results: Overall patients were broadly sensitized with a median cPRA of 99%. Of the 53 total patients, 41 were African American (77%). The mean T cell FXM (77±66 MCS vs 15±29; p=<0.0001), B cell FXM (95±44 MCS vs 39±42; p=<0.0001) and cumulative DSA at transplant (6195±5844MFI vs 2745±5527MFI; p=<0.0001) was higher in the desensitized group. There was no difference in GFR at 3 months (62.9±21.5 vs 67.1±23.6 ml/min/1.73m2; p=0.52), 6 months (57.9±25.8 vs 63.5±22.1 ml/min/1.73m2; p=0.41) and 12 months (61.9±24.0 vs 62.1±21.8 ml/min/1.73m2; p=0.98) between the two groups. The desensitization group had a high rate of subclinical ABMR in the first year post transplant (14/19; 74% vs 10/34; 29%; p=0.002) and higher rate of chronic active ABMR (11/19; 58% vs 8/34; 23% p=0.01). All five patients who were re-grafts and had a T cell FXM > 100 developed ABMR. In the entire cohort, a T-Cell FXM>100 was associated with a relative risk of 2.01 (p=0.0072) of subclinical acute ABMR and 2.85 (p=0.0006) of chronic ABMR post-transplant.

*Conclusions: In this report, we find that patients subjected to a post-transplant desensitization protocol had reasonable allograft function in the first year post transplant compared to those who did not undergo desensitization. Based upon a routine surveillance biopsy protocol, we found a very high rate of subclinical ABMR that was seen predominantly in re-transplant patients with a T-cell FXM>100. Pre-operative desensitization using novel strategies currently being investigated may lower the immunologic barriers that these patients face after transplant.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kumar D, Song C, Kamal L, Moinuddin I, Levy M, Bhati C, King A, Kimball P, Gupta G. Outcomes of Post-Transplant Desensitization in High Immunological Risk Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2020; 20 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/outcomes-of-post-transplant-desensitization-in-high-immunological-risk-deceased-donor-kidney-transplant-recipients/. Accessed May 16, 2025.

« Back to 2020 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences