ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Liver Transplantation with Super Obese Donors (BMI≥50) Grafts: An Acceptable Pathway to Expand the Donor Pool. Analysis of the OPTN/UNOS Liver Transplant Registry

P. Vargas1, C. Argo2, H. Zachary2, M. Stotts2, N. Intagliata2, P. Northup2, J. Oberholzer1, S. Pelletier1, N. Goldaracena1

1Transplant Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, 2Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA

Meeting: 2021 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: 1161

Keywords: Donors, marginal, Liver grafts, Liver transplantation, Obesity

Topic: Clinical Science » Liver » Liver: MELD, Allocation and Donor Issues (DCD/ECD)

Session Information

Session Name: Liver: MELD, Allocation and Donor Issues (DCD/ECD)

Session Type: Poster Abstract

Session Date & Time: None. Available on demand.

Location: Virtual

*Purpose: We aimed to analyze the impact of donor body mass index (BMI) on recipient morbidity and survival following liver transplantation (LT).

*Methods: The UNOS-STAR database was queried to identify adult patients undergoing LT from 2010-2019. Records of recipients and donors <18 years, donors with BMI <18, transplants before 2010, split-LT, living donors LT, DCD and multi-organ transplants were excluded from the analysis. Graft outcomes were analyzed by univariate analyses. Graft and patient survival were assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves.

*Results: 45,721 patients were identified. Of these, 45,300 patients received a graft from a donor with BMI<50 (BMI<50 group) and 421 from a super obese donor (BMI≥50 group). Recipients median (IQR) age (57 (51-63) vs 58 (52-64), p=0.11) and BMI (28.1 (24.6-32.4) vs 29 (25.5-33.3), p=0.43) were similar in the donor BMI<50 group vs donor BMI≥50 group, respectively. Proportion of males among groups were significantly higher in the donor BMI≥50 group (79.1% vs 67.4%, p=<0.001). Donor mean age was significantly higher in the donor BMI≥50 group (47 (38-55) vs 44 (30-56), p=<0.001). By definition donor BMI was significantly higher in the donor BMI≥50 group (54.1 (51.7-57.6) vs 27.1 (23.8-31.4), p=<0.001). Proportion of donor males were significantly higher in the BMI<50 group (59.0% vs 24.9%, p=0.001). The percentage of liver biopsy performed was significantly higher in the BMI≥50 group (83.4% vs 41.5%, p=<0.001). Among those with liver biopsy, the median (IQR) of reported percentage of macrosteatosis was 10% (4-20) in the donor BMI≥50 group vs 5% (0-10) in the donor BMI <50 group, p=<0.001). Macrosteatosis ≥30% was present in 56/339 (16%) in the donor BMI≥50 group vs 1626/17940 (8.6%) in the donor BMI<50 group, p=<0.001. Mean CIT was similar between groups. Median length of stay after LT was significantly longer in the donor BMI<50 group (10 (0-737) vs 9 (0-126) days, p=<0.001). Graft failure, recipient death and re-transplant rates were similar between groups (5.7%, 16.9% and 2.5% for the donor BMI<50 group and 5.7%, 14.7% and 2.6% in the donor BMI≥50 group, respectively, p=0.61). Graft and patient survival at 1-, 3- and 5- year were similar between groups (89%, 79%, 73% vs 88%, 81%, 71%, p=0.83, and 91%, 81%, 75% vs 91%, 83%, 71%, p=0.87, in the donor BMI <50 group vs donor BMI≥50 group, respectively).

*Conclusions: The use of grafts from super obese donors can safely expand the organ pool in selected recipients. Grafts from super obese donors should not be rule out based solely on their BMI and biopsy of these grafts might play an important role in the decision-making process.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Vargas P, Argo C, Zachary H, Stotts M, Intagliata N, Northup P, Oberholzer J, Pelletier S, Goldaracena N. Liver Transplantation with Super Obese Donors (BMI≥50) Grafts: An Acceptable Pathway to Expand the Donor Pool. Analysis of the OPTN/UNOS Liver Transplant Registry [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2021; 21 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/liver-transplantation-with-super-obese-donors-bmi%e2%89%a550-grafts-an-acceptable-pathway-to-expand-the-donor-pool-analysis-of-the-optn-unos-liver-transplant-registry/. Accessed May 9, 2025.

« Back to 2021 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences