ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Incorporating Markers of Donor Organ Intrinsic Biology Into Donor Quality Evaluation

J. Suh, K. Archer, L. Gallon, I. McConell, A. King, D. Maluf, V. Mas.

UVA, Charlottesville, VA
Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
VCU, Richmond, VA.

Meeting: 2015 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: A61

Keywords: Donors, Genomic markers, Kidney transplantation, marginal

Session Information

Session Name: Poster Session A: Donor Management: All Organs

Session Type: Poster Session

Date: Saturday, May 2, 2015

Session Time: 5:30pm-7:30pm

 Presentation Time: 5:30pm-7:30pm

Location: Exhibit Hall E

Background. We aimed to identify a reliable composite scoring system (clinical / biological) to evalute organ quality and predict outcomes post-kidney transplantation (KT).

Methods. 233 deceased donor KT recipients (KTRs) were evaluated. Gene expression (GE) profiling of pre-implantation kidney biopsies was performed. Clinical and transcriptome data was integrated in composite score models. Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) was tested for performance in the study cohort. Short-(DGF) and long-term outcomes (Progressors (P) or non-Progressors (NP) to CAD at 24-mo) were evaluated. Using two patient subsets, GE biomarkers predictive of post-KT outcomes were first identified and confirmed by a non-parametric Spearman correlation test. Combing these predictive biomarkers with patients' clinical variables, generalized multivariate regression models were developed on training patient data. The performance of the final multivariate prediction models was validated on independent patient subsets by evaluating overall prediction concordance with a rank-based correlation test and the C statistics.

Results.The performance of the KDRI score predicting (a) short- and (b) long- term outcomes was evaluated as: (a) For 233 DD KTRs with both KDRI and DGF (100 yes; 133 no), KDRI was not a significant predictor of DGF (p = 0.19). The threshold of KDRI that optimizes sensitivity and specificity was 1.104 yielding a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 62.6%, 55.2%, and 58.4% respectively and (b) For 214 subjects with both KDRI and outcome (100 P; 114 NP), the threshold of KDRI that optimizes sensitivity and specificity was 1.01 yielding a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 50.9% for an accuracy of 64.5%. Using our available data set, several predictive models for predicting outcomes for KT were obtained and independently validated by integrating molecular and clinical information. In these models both donor age and several molecular markers were found to be important for the prediction of KT outcomes.

Composite Scores
Month Predictive combined markers Validation set p-value Independent validation p-value
1 donor age, STS, EGF, UBR7 0.0000125 0.023
3 donor age, DUSP6, RGS1,CXCR4 0.00000801 0.032
12 donor age, race, recipient age, GPNMB , RGS10, SNX1 0.000238 0.043

Conclusions. These results show the feasibility of establishing accurate composite scores for predicting post-KT outcomes including markers of intrinsic donor biology.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Suh J, Archer K, Gallon L, McConell I, King A, Maluf D, Mas V. Incorporating Markers of Donor Organ Intrinsic Biology Into Donor Quality Evaluation [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2015; 15 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/incorporating-markers-of-donor-organ-intrinsic-biology-into-donor-quality-evaluation/. Accessed May 11, 2025.

« Back to 2015 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences