ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Impact of Transplant Ureteral Stricture Location and Type of Ureteral Revision on Long-Term Graft Survival and Patient Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation

C. Shepherd1, R. Cameron2, C. Holbrooks2, A. Lin3, S. Nadig3, J. McGillicuddy3, D. Dubay3, D. Taber3, P. Baliga3, V. Rohan3

1Urology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 2College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 3Transplant Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

Meeting: 2019 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: C127

Keywords: Graft failure, Kidney transplantation, Rejection, Surgical complications

Session Information

Session Name: Poster Session C: Kidney Technical

Session Type: Poster Session

Date: Monday, June 3, 2019

Session Time: 6:00pm-7:00pm

 Presentation Time: 6:00pm-7:00pm

Location: Hall C & D

*Purpose: Transplant ureteral strictures are a major cause of morbidity following kidney transplantation and often require surgical revision including ureteroureterostomy (UU) and neocystoureterostomy (NC). Our objective was to determine the long term graft survival and patient outcomes based on the site of ureteral stricture and type of ureteral revision surgery.

*Methods: We conducted a retrospective longitudinal cohort study of kidney recipients that developed urological complications necessitating surgical intervention following transplantation; 27 patients were identified over a 10 year period. Outcomes measured included type of operation, complications, readmissions, urologic infection, renal function, acute rejection, graft and patient survival.

*Results: Of the 27 patients, 4 had proximal strictures, 1 had a mid-ureteral stricture, 18 had distal strictures, and 4 had pan-ureteral strictures. Readmission rates and renal function pre- and post-revision were similar among groups. Patients with pan-ureteral strictures tended to have more recurrent strictures (4/9 vs 4/18, p=0.233) while also being less likely to develop infections (5/9 vs 11/18, p=0.077). Rejection rates were similar among proximal (25%), distal (42.8%) and pan-ureteral (25%) strictures. When comparing NC with UU, there was no difference in readmission rates (13/24 vs 2/4, p=0.735) or pre- and post-revision creatinine (mean 2.67 vs 1.59mg/dL); however, those with NC were more than two times more likely to develop infections (16/24 vs. 1/4, p=0.114) but were only half as likely to develop recurrent strictures (7/24 vs. 2/4, p=0.409). Overall, graft survival was 85.7% and patient survival was 96.4% with a mean follow-up of 6.2 years. Average baseline creatinine was 2.6 mg/dL prior to surgical revision with an average nadir creatinine of 1.5 mg/dL post revision. There were four graft failures over the study period, all in the NC group with average time to graft failure of 8.1 years. When comparing patients who received a kidney from a deceased donor (N=20) vs. a living donor (N=7), rates of infection (12/20 vs. 4/7, p=0.895) and readmission (10/20 vs. 4/7, p=0.745) were similar. However, deceased donors were more likely to develop rejection (7/20 vs. 1/7, p=0.302), graft failure (4/20 vs. 0/7, p=0.199), and stricture recurrence (7/20 vs. 1/7, p=0.302) after ureteral revision.

*Conclusions: These results suggest that ureteral stricture location and revision type do not significantly impact renal function or readmission rates, but may influence stricture recurrence and urologic infections. However, long-term graft and patient survival is better than expected in this cohort of kidney transplant recipients undergoing surgical intervention for complicated ureteral strictures.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Shepherd C, Cameron R, Holbrooks C, Lin A, Nadig S, McGillicuddy J, Dubay D, Taber D, Baliga P, Rohan V. Impact of Transplant Ureteral Stricture Location and Type of Ureteral Revision on Long-Term Graft Survival and Patient Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2019; 19 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/impact-of-transplant-ureteral-stricture-location-and-type-of-ureteral-revision-on-long-term-graft-survival-and-patient-outcomes-in-kidney-transplantation/. Accessed May 9, 2025.

« Back to 2019 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences