Impact Of Selective Cd28 Blockade On Protective Immunity To A Murine Epstein-Barr Virus Homolog
Surgery, Emory University, ATLANTA, GA
Meeting: 2019 American Transplant Congress
Abstract number: 262
Keywords: Co-stimulation, Immunosuppression, Infection
Session Information
Session Name: Concurrent Session: Immunosuppression Preclinical Studies
Session Type: Concurrent Session
Date: Monday, June 3, 2019
Session Time: 2:30pm-4:00pm
Presentation Time: 2:54pm-3:06pm
Location: Room 309
*Purpose: CTLA-4Ig blocks CD80/CD86, the ligands for both CD28 and CTLA-4. Thus, in addition to the intended effect of blocking CD28-mediated costimulation, CTLA4-Ig also has the unintended effect of blocking CTLA-4-mediated coinhibitory signaling. Recently, anti-CD28 domain antibodies (dAb) that selectively target CD28 while leaving CTLA-4 signaling intact were shown to more effectively inhibit alloimmune responses and prolong graft survival in both murine models and non-human primates. However, the impact of selective CD28 blockade on protective immunity has not yet been investigated.
*Methods: We sought to compare the impact of CTLA-4Ig vs. anti-CD28dAb on murine CD8+ T cell immunity in the setting of a transplant-relevant pathogen, a murine homolog of Epstein-Barr virus. C57BL/6 mice were infected with 2×103 PFU of a YFP-labeled recombinant murine gammaherpesvirus-68 (MHV-68) and treated with saline control, CTLA-4Ig, or anti-CD28 dAb. Splenocytes from infected mice were harvested at 14 and 28 days post infection and anti-viral immune responses and viral load were assessed via flow cytometry.
*Results: While anti-CD28dAb treatment resulted in a decrease in virus-specific CD8+ T cell frequencies and numbers as compared to CTLA-4Ig, effector function in the form of IFN-gamma production was not different between treatment groups. Similarly, viSNE analysis revealed that the expression of CXCR3 and CD27, surface markers indicating high-quality effector function, was also similar between the anti-CD28dAb and CTLA-4Ig treated groups. Additionally, CITRUS analysis of co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory marker expression (PD-1, TIM-3, and TIGIT) on MHV-specific CD8+ T cells demonstrated no difference between the two treatment groups. Importantly, MHV viral load was not significantly different between the anti-CD28dab and CTLA-4Ig treatment groups.
*Conclusions: We demonstrate that preserved CTLA-4 co-inhibition limits MHV-specific T cell accumulation, but the virus-specific CD8+ T cell population that remains retains sufficient effector function to control viral burden. These data indicate that use of selective CD28 blockade, in the form of non-crosslinking anti-CD28 dAb, is equivalent to CTLA-4Ig in its ability to control viral load during gammaherpesvirus infection, further highlighting the clinical promise of this therapy.
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Crepeau RL, Elengickal JA, Ford ML. Impact Of Selective Cd28 Blockade On Protective Immunity To A Murine Epstein-Barr Virus Homolog [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2019; 19 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/impact-of-selective-cd28-blockade-on-protective-immunity-to-a-murine-epstein-barr-virus-homolog/. Accessed November 22, 2024.« Back to 2019 American Transplant Congress