ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Feasibility and Limitations of Desensitization Therapy in Highly Sensitized Pediatric ESRD Patients: A Single-Center Experience

J. Steggerda1, H. Pizzo2, X. Zhang3, J. Garrison2, I. Kim1, M. Haas4, A. Vo1, S. Jordan1, D. Puliyanda2

1Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Med Ctr, West Hollywood, CA, 2Pediatric Nephrology, Cedars-Sinai Med Ctr, West Hollywood, CA, 3HLA Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Med Ctr, West Hollywood, CA, 4Renal Pathology, Cedars-Sinai Med Ctr, West Hollywood, CA

Meeting: 2020 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: A-069

Keywords: Graft survival, Highly-sensitized, Pediatric

Session Information

Session Name: Poster Session A: Kidney: Pediatrics

Session Type: Poster Session

Date: Saturday, May 30, 2020

Session Time: 3:15pm-4:00pm

 Presentation Time: 3:30pm-4:00pm

Location: Virtual

*Purpose: There are a growing number of pediatric (peds) patients (pts) awaiting renal transplantation (tx) who are considered highly sensitized (HS). We report long-term outcomes of desensitization (des) in HS peds tx recipients.

*Methods: HS peds renal tx performed between 1/2009 and 6/2019 were evaluated. HS was defined as calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) >30%. Pts underwent des with IVIG +/- plasmapheresis, rituximab, and/or Tocilizumab (added after 2013). All pts received alemtuzumab induction (15-30mg SQ at time of tx) and were on tacrolimus, mycophenolate and steroids. Pts were evaluated for cPRA prior to, and following des, HLA mismatch, and DSA. Serum creatinine (sCr), rejection, pts and graft survival (GS) were evaluated.

*Results: 23 HS peds pts underwent des. Sensitizing events included prior tx (n=20, 87.0%), transfusion (n=9, 39.1%. 2 pts(8.7%) had no obvious sensitizing event. The peak cPRA was 74 (interquartile range, IQR= 49-90). Most pts were desensitized using IVIG and rituximab (86.9%); three (13.0%) with plasmapheresis, IVIG, and tocilizumab. Nine (39.1%) received more than one round of des. Only 6(26.1%) showed decrease in cPRA after treatment (mean change -22.6% ± 10.1%). Median time between dialysis and des was 1091 days(691-1744), and between des and tx was 207 days (IQR 64-445). 4(17.4%) received a living donor kidney tx. All pts had at least 2 HLA mismatches. B-cell (BCFCMX) and T-cell flow crossmatches (TCFCMX) at tx were 156 MCS (104-189) and 39 MCS (8-99) respectively (acceptable BCFCMX and TCFCMX<250 MCS). 13(56.5%) had preformed DSA at tx and 6(25.8%) developed de novo DSA. 2 tx (8.7%) had delayed graft function; median sCr at discharge was 0.9 (IQR 0.5-1.7). Over median 1721 days of follow-up, 14(60.8%) had rejection, 9 were within 1 year of transplant. Five (26.3%) showed ABMR, 7 (36.8%) with TCMR and 2 (10.5%) had both. Of pts with rejection, 9 (69.2%) had preformed DSA and 6(50%) developed de novo DSA. One-year graft survival was 91.3% while overall, 4 (17.4%) experienced graft loss during follow up: 1 from CMV disease, 1 recurrent FSGS and 2 ABMR. One pt died at 2217 days post-tx.

*Conclusions: Desensitization therapy does not significantly change cPRA scores but can result in acceptable crossmatch and decreased wait time for HS peds pts with ESRD. Use of T-cell depleting agents for induction allows for feasible renal tx. While rejection remains a serious concern with preformed DSA as a primary risk factor, 1-year GS is acceptable. Continued utilization will provide additional information for analysis and promotion of desensitization in this population.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Steggerda J, Pizzo H, Zhang X, Garrison J, Kim I, Haas M, Vo A, Jordan S, Puliyanda D. Feasibility and Limitations of Desensitization Therapy in Highly Sensitized Pediatric ESRD Patients: A Single-Center Experience [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2020; 20 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/feasibility-and-limitations-of-desensitization-therapy-in-highly-sensitized-pediatric-esrd-patients-a-single-center-experience/. Accessed May 16, 2025.

« Back to 2020 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences