ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Experience Using a Discharge Calculator for Discharge Planning Post Liver Transplantation (OLT).

K. Kerepesi, A. Waby, K. Eid, J. Plescia, K. Zinn, K. Vass, B. Eghtesad, C. Miller, D. Kelly.

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

Meeting: 2016 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: 328

Keywords: Length of stay, Liver transplantation, Prediction models

Session Information

Session Name: Concurrent Session: Liver Transplantation Peri-Operative Considerations

Session Type: Concurrent Session

Date: Monday, June 13, 2016

Session Time: 4:30pm-6:00pm

 Presentation Time: 5:06pm-5:18pm

Location: Room 311

We previously developed and validated a nomogram to predict discharge disposition post OLT. The current study analyzes our experience using the discharge calculator.

Patients &Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed data on 430 adults transplanted between 01/2012 and 11/2015. Patients that died <30 days were excluded. The discharge calculator, available online, utilizes the following: Karnofsky score, age, INR, creatinine, diabetes, dialysis, bilirubin, albumin, and BMI. The calculation performed at admission for OLT was shared with the transplant team. Patients with a predictive value of ≥ 60% were considered high risk for discharge to a facility. Early discharge planning and physical therapy (PT) were based on discharge probability. Continuous variables were described by means and standard deviations. Predictions from existing nomogram were validated against the actual observed outcomes from the prospectively collected data using the C-index (ROC AUC).

Results:

132/430 (30%) of patients were discharged to a facility with a predictive score of 60±24% and 298 were discharged home with a predictive score of 27±22% (p<0.0001). The characteristics of the population going to a facility were: older age (p=.004), higher MELD score (p<0.001), higher BMI (p=0.001), number of hospital admissions prior to OLT (p=0.002), higher creatinine (p<0.001), longer ICU length of stay (p<0.001), recipients of cadaveric grafts vs. living donor grafts (p=0.04), hospitalized at the time of OLT (p<0.001), encephalopathy (p<0.001), arrhythmia (p<0.001), dialysis (p<0.001), ascites and hydrothorax (p<0.001).

107 patients had a predictive value >60% for discharge to a facility. 31(28%) of these were discharged home. The only significant factor in the patients that were able to be discharged home was less time in ICU, 2.3 ± 1.9 vs. 9.1±13 days (p<0.001).

The concordance index for discharge disposition prediction is 0.835. For higher predictions >80% (n=44) the model over-predicts discharge to a facility, but even at this level 75% (n=33) of patients are actually discharged to a facility. The intensive discharge planning and PT regimen may impact the discharge disposition in these patients.

Conclusion:

The discharge calculator is a vital component in early discharge planning for the transplant team. The concordance index of 0.835 is reflected in its accuracy in clinical practice. The over-prediction at higher values may reflect the response of the clinical team to the initial predictive value.

CITATION INFORMATION: Kerepesi K, Waby A, Eid K, Plescia J, Zinn K, Vass K, Eghtesad B, Miller C, Kelly D. Experience Using a Discharge Calculator for Discharge Planning Post Liver Transplantation (OLT). Am J Transplant. 2016;16 (suppl 3).

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kerepesi K, Waby A, Eid K, Plescia J, Zinn K, Vass K, Eghtesad B, Miller C, Kelly D. Experience Using a Discharge Calculator for Discharge Planning Post Liver Transplantation (OLT). [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2016; 16 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/experience-using-a-discharge-calculator-for-discharge-planning-post-liver-transplantation-olt/. Accessed May 11, 2025.

« Back to 2016 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences