ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Effect of Drain Placement on the Rate of Wound Complications in Kidney Transplantation, The

R. Sidebottom, A. Parsikia, P. Chang, Z. Berhane, S. Campos, K. Khanmoradi, R. Zaki, J. Ortiz

Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia
Drexel University, Philadelphia

Meeting: 2013 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: D1742

Introduction

Wound complications are common complications after kidney transplantation. We sought to determine whether the placement of a drain was associated with a decreased incidence of wound complications.

Methods:

A retrospective study between 2001 to 2008, comparing kidney transplant patients who were drained or not drained. Known risk factors for wound issues (DGF, DM, BMI, and donor statistics) were statistically adjusted between the two groups. Patients received calcineurin inhibitors, steroids and mycophenolate. In order to facilitate statistical analysis, seroma, lymphocele, and perigraft fluid collections were combined as the variable “wound collections”; and wound dehiscence, hematomas, evisceration, infections, wound necrosis, and hernias were combined as the variable “wound complication”. A logistic regression analysis was run to compare the drained (D) and not drained (ND) groups. Patients with incomplete data or taking Sirolimus were excluded.

Results

680 kidney transplantations were reviewed. 479 in the D group; 201 in the ND group. Wound collections were observed 6/479(2.99%) in the D group compared to 9/201(1.88%) in the ND (p = 0.37). Wound complications were noted in 17/479 (8.46%) in the D group and 58/201 (12.18%) in the ND group (p = 0.16).We corrected for known risk factors such as DGF, DM, BMI, and donor statistics. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of wound complications and wound collections.

Conclussion

Drain placement does not prevent wound complications; even in high risk patients.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sidebottom R, Parsikia A, Chang P, Berhane Z, Campos S, Khanmoradi K, Zaki R, Ortiz J. Effect of Drain Placement on the Rate of Wound Complications in Kidney Transplantation, The [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2013; 13 (suppl 5). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/effect-of-drain-placement-on-the-rate-of-wound-complications-in-kidney-transplantation-the/. Accessed May 9, 2025.

« Back to 2013 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences