ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Comparing Outcomes between Induction Immunosuppressive Therapies in Simultaneous Liver/Kidney Transplantation

U. Gautam, T. Reichman, J. Yu, S. Koppu, D. Bandyopadhyay, M. Levy, G. Gupta, L. Kamal.

Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.

Meeting: 2018 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: D202

Keywords: Induction therapy, Kidney/liver transplantation, Survival

Session Information

Session Name: Poster Session D: Liver - Kidney Issues in Liver Transplantation

Session Type: Poster Session

Date: Tuesday, June 5, 2018

Session Time: 6:00pm-7:00pm

 Presentation Time: 6:00pm-7:00pm

Location: Hall 4EF

Introduction: There is no data on the risks and benefits of induction immunosuppression in simultaneous liver/kidney transplant (SLKT) patients.

Methods: We analyzed all SLKT performed between 1996 and 2016 using the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN) registry. Patients were divided into 3 groups based upon their induction regimen: T cell depleting (r-ATG); IL2 receptor blockers (IL2RB) and no-induction (NI).

Results: Among 5180 patients, 18% received r-ATG, 32% received IL2RB and 50% received NI. Patients in the r-ATG group were more likely to be females (40% vs 32.5% in IL2RB vs 34% in NI; p<0.001), less likely to have hepatitis C (32% vs 38% in IL2RB vs 38% in NI; p<0.001), had lower MELD score (28 ±8, vs 29±8 in IL2RB vs 30±8 in NI; p<0.001) and were more likely to be on steroid sparing protocol (37% vs 12% vs 13%,; p<0.001). There was no difference in regards to recipient age, race, diabetes status, Kidney Donor Risk Index, allocation type (national/regional/local) and rates of acute rejection in the first year after transplant. At 5 years, patient survival was 74.1% in the r-ATG group, 81.4% in the IL2RB group and 76.0% in the NI group (p<0.001). Similar trends were seen for 5-year liver and kidney graft survivals. When patients were separated into 2 periods (period 1 from 1996 to 2006 and period 2 from 2006 to 2016), Chi-square test of Association showed that there were period effects. After controlling for period effects, in period 1, there was no difference in patient or kidney or liver survival between the 3 groups. However, in period 2, Kaplan Meier analysis showed difference in patient, kidney and liver survival (log rank p 0.0019, 0.013, 0.006 respectively), with rATG group having the worst patient and graft survival.

On multivariate analysis, when compared to NI, neither rATG nor IL2RB had a significant difference in survival risk. However, rATG induction was associated with worse kidney survival (HR=1.39; 95%CI=1.1-1.75; p=0.005) and liver survival (HR=1.36; 95%CI=1.06-1.75; p=0.02); while IL2RB had no impact on kidney and liver survivals as opposed to those who received no induction.

Conclusions: This analysis of SLKT from OPTN registry shows that rATG induction is associated with worse kidney and liver allograft survival. There seems to be a time period effect. This data should be interpreted with caution due to the inherent limitations of a registry based analysis.

CITATION INFORMATION: Gautam U., Reichman T., Yu J., Koppu S., Bandyopadhyay D., Levy M., Gupta G., Kamal L. Comparing Outcomes between Induction Immunosuppressive Therapies in Simultaneous Liver/Kidney Transplantation Am J Transplant. 2017;17 (suppl 3).

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gautam U, Reichman T, Yu J, Koppu S, Bandyopadhyay D, Levy M, Gupta G, Kamal L. Comparing Outcomes between Induction Immunosuppressive Therapies in Simultaneous Liver/Kidney Transplantation [abstract]. https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/comparing-outcomes-between-induction-immunosuppressive-therapies-in-simultaneous-liver-kidney-transplantation/. Accessed May 16, 2025.

« Back to 2018 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences