ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Advanced Search

“2mm” Is Reasonable and Feasible Cutoff Value of Indication for Vascular Reconstruction in a Kidney Allograft With Multiple Arteries

D. Iwami, K. Morita, H. Sasaki, Y. Oishi, H. Higuchi, N. Shinohara.

Urology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.

Meeting: 2015 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: C224

Keywords: Kidney transplantation, Surgical complications

Session Information

Date: Monday, May 4, 2015

Session Name: Poster Session C: Surgical Issues/Ureteral Complications

Session Time: 5:30pm-6:30pm

 Presentation Time: 5:30pm-6:30pm

Location: Exhibit Hall E

Related Abstracts
  • Inferior 10-Year Graft and Patient Survival After End-to-Side Reconstruction for Two Renal Arteries in Living Donor Renal Transplantation.
  • Outcome of Partial Reconstruction of Multiple Hepatic Arteries in Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using Left Lateral Section Grafts.

Introduction: Multiple renal arteries are found in 18 to 43% of donor kidneys. We've been using cutoff diameter of <2mm for accessory arteries measured by pre-operative CT angiography to determine whether to sacrifice or reconstruct the artery unless the branches feed the ureter. We aimed to assess the validity and feasibility of this cutoff value.

Patients&Methods: Living related kidney recipients between 2005 and 2013 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Deceased donor cases and recipients younger than 15 y.o. at transplant were excluded. Diameter of accessory artery, reconstructive techniques, and adverse events were evaluated. Moreover, lost parenchymal volume (%) due to obstruction or ligation of accessory artery was calculated by CT volumetry using ziostation2 software (Ziosoft, Inc.).

Results: In 128 kidney transplants, 30 donor kidneys had multiple arteries: 2 arteries in 27 cases and 3 in 3. Accessory arteries were reconstructed in 18 cases and intentionally ligated in the other 12 cases. Mean diameter of accessory arteries were 3.10±0.75mm and 1.81±0.28mm, respectively (p<0.05). Reconstructive techniques were hypogastric artery graft (10 cases), conjoined (4 cases), end-to-side anastomosis to main trunk (3 cases), and combination of end-to-side and conjoined (1 case). Mean eGFR at 1 month and 1 year after transplant were not significantly different. In reconstructed cases, 14 cases (77.8%) had good patency in the reconstructed arteries whereas the other 4 had vascular complications (obstruction in 1 and stenosis in 3 cases). When renal parenchymal volume loss due to ligation or occlusion of the accessory artery was calculated (16 cases were evaluated), it was predictable with a formula: lost volume (%) = 9.09 x D (diameter, mm) – 10.5 (p=0.027, rs=0.533 by Spearman's rank Correlation Coefficient). According to the formula, ligation of an accessory artery of 2mm leads to loss of 7.68% of renal parenchyma.

Conclusions: Cutoff value of 2mm is worth trying to reconstruct in terms of successful rate and graft function. Sacrifice of accessory artery with 2mm leads to parenchymal loss smaller than 8%.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Iwami D, Morita K, Sasaki H, Oishi Y, Higuchi H, Shinohara N. “2mm” Is Reasonable and Feasible Cutoff Value of Indication for Vascular Reconstruction in a Kidney Allograft With Multiple Arteries [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2015; 15 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/2mm-is-reasonable-and-feasible-cutoff-value-of-indication-for-vascular-reconstruction-in-a-kidney-allograft-with-multiple-arteries/. Accessed January 22, 2021.

« Back to 2015 American Transplant Congress

Most Viewed Abstracts

  • This Week
  • This Month
  • All Time
  • Subtherapeutic Low Tacrolimus Trough Levels (≤3.5 Ng /ml) Are A Risk Factor For Acute Rejection And Creatinine Doubling.
  • Penis Transplantation: First U.S. Experience.
  • Low GFR after Kidney Donation Is Not Chronic Kidney Disease
  • Is There a Difference Between DCD and DBD Kidney Transplantation with Similar KDPI?
  • Live Related Kidney Transplant Experience in Abuja, Nigeria – First Eight Cases Ever.
    • Penis Transplantation: First U.S. Experience.
    • Is There a Difference Between DCD and DBD Kidney Transplantation with Similar KDPI?
    • Low GFR after Kidney Donation Is Not Chronic Kidney Disease
    • Evidence of a Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interaction between Cannabidiol and Tacrolimus: A Case Report
    • Kidney Dialysis after Heart Transplantation: The Short and Long Term Outcomes

    Visit Our Partner Sites

    American Transplant Congress (ATC)

    Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

    American Journal of Transplantation

    The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

    American Society of Transplantation (AST)

    An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

    American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

    The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

    Copyright © 2013-2021 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

    Privacy Policy

    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
    This site uses cookies: Find out more.