ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

MELD/PELD 35+ Candidates Benefit from Regional Sharing

E. Edwards,1 A. Harper,1 R. Hirose,2 D. Mulligan.3

1Research, UNOS, Richmond, VA
2Divsion of Transplant, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
3Department of Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT.

Meeting: 2015 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: 483

Keywords: Allocation, Liver, Outcome, Waiting lists

Session Information

Session Name: Concurrent Session: Liver Transplant Allocation Policy

Session Type: Concurrent Session

Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2015

Session Time: 4:00pm-5:30pm

 Presentation Time: 4:12pm-4:24pm

Location: Room 122-AB

Background: Based on a proposal from the Liver and Intestinal Organ Transplantation Committee, the OPTN implemented regional sharing for MELD/PELD 35+ candidates on June 18, 2013. The intent of the policy change was to reduce the waiting list mortality for the most urgent, non-Status 1 candidates. The policy was not intended to reduce the variance in the median MELD at transplant. Methods: To examine the impact of this policy, we analyzed waiting list outcomes for all candidates who first entered the allocation MELD/PELD 35+ category in the one-year period prior to implementation and the one-year period post-implementation. We also analyzed post-transplant outcomes for MELD/PELD 35+ recipients during the first 4 months of both the pre- and post-implementation eras. Results: Overall there were 328 more deceased donor liver transplants in the post-era. The variance in the median MELD at transplant increased from 14.3 to 17.6. The percentage of transplants in the MELD/PELD 35+ category increased from 18.7% in the pre-era to 26.3% in the post-era. Additionally, the percentage of regional transplants increased from 20.4% in the pre-era to 31.8% in the post-era. While the overall median distance livers traveled increased from 59 miles to 85 miles, the median CIT and DRI were unchanged. Liver discard rates dropped from 10.3% to 9.5%. The transplant rates within 90 days of first entering the MELD/PELD 35+ category were significantly higher in the post-era, while the death rates were significantly lower (see table). There were no statistically significant changes to overall waiting list mortality by region, age (pediatric vs adult), ethnicity, or within the other MELD/PELD categories. Overall 6-month patient survival rates were similar pre- and post-policy (93.6% pre, 93.4% post), as were patient survival rates among MELD/PELD 35+ recipients (90.2% pre, 90.4% post). Conclusions: The policy designed to reduce the waiting list mortality rates for the most urgent MELD/PELD candidates is working as intended, without impacting the overall post-transplant survival in the post-era. The Committee will continue to monitor the results of Share 35 and related policies.

MELD/PELD 35+ Waiting List Outcomes, By Era
Outcome 90-day Prob. (%) 95% Lower CI 95% Upper CI
Transplant-Pre Era 57.6 55.4 59.8
Transplant-Post Era 66.1 64.2 67.9
Death-Pre Era 32.2 30.1 34.3
Death-Post Era 24.4 22.7 26.2
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Edwards E, Harper A, Hirose R, Mulligan D. MELD/PELD 35+ Candidates Benefit from Regional Sharing [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2015; 15 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/meldpeld-35-candidates-benefit-from-regional-sharing/. Accessed May 18, 2025.

« Back to 2015 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences