Differential Clinical Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients With De Novo C1q+ and C1q- Donor Specific Antibodies
1Transplantation, Einstein/Montefiore Transplant Center, Bronx
2Tissue Typing Laboratory, Einstein/Montefiore Transplant Center, Bronx
3General Nephrology, Einstein/Montefiore Teaching Hospital, Bronx.
Meeting: 2015 American Transplant Congress
Abstract number: 372
Keywords: Antibodies, Sensitization
Session Information
Session Name: Concurrent Session: Kidney: Antibodies and Allograft Injury
Session Type: Concurrent Session
Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2015
Session Time: 2:15pm-3:45pm
Presentation Time: 2:39pm-2:51pm
Location: Room 118-AB
Background: We investigated the prevalence and clinical significance of C1q binding versus non-C1q binding de novo DSA in kidney transplant recipients.
Methods: The study group included consecutive patients who received kidney transplantation at our center between May 2009 and December 2012, and had no pre-formed DSA. Serum anti-HLA antibodies were monitored after transplantation at 3, 12 months and yearly thereafter, and at the time of clinically indicated biopsies. To characterize DSA specificity and complement binding capacity, conventional and C1q Single Antigen Bead assays were used.
.Results: Out of 284 patients, 31 (11%) developed de novo DSA during a median follow-up of 29 months (17, 50). Of these, 23% had class I, 46% had class II, and 31% showed both class I and II DSA. DSA directed to donor HLA-DQ were most frequently observed (48% of the patients with DSA). C1q+ DSA were identified in 11 out of 31 patients (35%). Overall, mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of class I C1q+ DSA were significantly higher compared to those of C1q- DSA (6476±3016 vs. 2471±1546 p=0.01) but not for class II (7198±3496 vs. 4616±3952, p=0.13). Incidence of acute and chronic AMR was significantly higher in the C1q+DSA+ (45% and 36%) group compared to the C1q-DSA (5% and 5%) and DSA- groups (1% and 2%) (p < 0.001).
Variable | No DSA(N=253) | De Novo C1q+ DSA(N=11) | De Novo C1q- DSA(N=20) | P value |
Mean age at transplant | 53±12.5 | 45.7±14.1 | 48.1±11.1 | 0.02 |
Gender, % female | 39 | 66 | 50 | 0.62 |
Race, % African American | 32 | 63 | 50 | 0.03 |
Transplant type, % living donor | 31 | 36 | 20 | 0.54 |
Previous Transplant,% | 9 | 0 | 10 | 0.56 |
Mean class I PRA | 21±31 | 37±41 | 47±36 | <0.001 |
Mean class II PRA | 22±32 | 60±35 | 64±31 | <0.001 |
Mean serum creatinine, mg/dl | 1.4±0.6 | 2.2±1.2 | 1.5±0.4 | 0.001 |
Acute cellular rejection,% | 5 | 9 | 5 | 0.81 |
Acute AMR, % | 1 | 45 | 5 | <0.001 |
Chronic AMR,% | 2 | 36 | 5 | <0.001 |
Graft survival,% | 94 | 73 | 95 | 0.01 |
Patient survival,% | 98 | 100 | 95 | 0.66 |
Conclusions: The development of C1q+ DSA after renal transplantation is associated with acute and chronic AMR, and lower graft survival and allograft function.
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Ajaimy M, Colovai A, Calp S, Lindower J, Melamed M, Akalin E. Differential Clinical Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients With De Novo C1q+ and C1q- Donor Specific Antibodies [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2015; 15 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/differential-clinical-outcomes-in-kidney-transplant-recipients-with-de-novo-c1q-and-c1q-donor-specific-antibodies/. Accessed November 21, 2024.« Back to 2015 American Transplant Congress