ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Skin as a Harbinger of Rejection of Underlying Structures in Vascularized Composite Allografts: Concordance or Discordance?

L. Cendales,1 M. Levine,2 S. Bartlett,3 J. Cheeseman,1 C. Drachenberg,3 W. Hancock,4 M. Joshi,1 A. Kirk,1 F. Leoopardi,1 S. Levin,2 M. Uluer,3 A. Selim,5 M. Song,1 W. Twaddell,3 L. Wang,4 Z. Wang,2 R. Barth.3

1Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
2University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
3University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
4Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
5Pathology, Duke University, Durham, NC.

Meeting: 2016 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: A96

Keywords: Primates, Rejection, Skin transplantation

Session Information

Session Name: Poster Session A: Clinical Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Session Type: Poster Session

Date: Saturday, June 11, 2016

Session Time: 5:30pm-7:30pm

 Presentation Time: 5:30pm-7:30pm

Location: Halls C&D

Vascularized composite allografts (VCA) are composed of multiple tissue types. It has not been determined as to whether there is an immune hierarchy or differential susceptibility of rejection amongst the included tissues. This has implications as to the utility of skin as a diagnostic sentinel of rejection and to the design of rescue strategies for rejection or graft loss. To assess the concordance or discordance of rejection of the skin and of the underlying tissues we made use of a new multicenter collaborative initiative -VCAci. We combined the preclinical results from 3 different centers in mice and non-human primates

Methods. Samples were shared electronically by Aperio imaging and read by pathologists to assess underlying structures when the skin was rejecting graded by Banff VCA. Descriptive definitions were used for tendon,nerve,muscle,bone,artery,and vein.

Results. Pathologists reviewed 104 slides: skin (n=24),muscle (n=24),nerve (n=13),tendon (n=13),bone (n=4),artery (n=13),and vein (n=13). Banff grades showed: Grade IV (n=12), Grade III (n=5), Grade II (n=2), and Grade I (n=3), Grade 0 (n=1). When skin rejection was diagnosed,at least one other tissue in the same transplant had signs of rejection (n=22 animals). Five animals with Banff IV and four animals with Banff III showed signs of rejection in all underlying soft tissues.One animal with Grade 0 had simultaneous endothelialitis around the tendon.One animal reached endpoint from malignancy. Necropsy showed Banff II with no signs of rejection in muscle,vessels or bone.

Summary. In the majority of cases the skin acts as a harbinger of rejection in underlying structures and thus remains an accessible and reasonably sensitive method for monitoring rejection.Rescue strategies in severe cases are unlikely to allow for the preservation of underlying structures and will likely require total graftectomy.This may have implications in planning rescue strategies for complex VCA.

CITATION INFORMATION: Cendales L, Levine M, Bartlett S, Cheeseman J, Drachenberg C, Hancock W, Joshi M, Kirk A, Leoopardi F, Levin S, Uluer M, Selim A, Song M, Twaddell W, Wang L, Wang Z, Barth R. Skin as a Harbinger of Rejection of Underlying Structures in Vascularized Composite Allografts: Concordance or Discordance? Am J Transplant. 2016;16 (suppl 3).

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Cendales L, Levine M, Bartlett S, Cheeseman J, Drachenberg C, Hancock W, Joshi M, Kirk A, Leoopardi F, Levin S, Uluer M, Selim A, Song M, Twaddell W, Wang L, Wang Z, Barth R. Skin as a Harbinger of Rejection of Underlying Structures in Vascularized Composite Allografts: Concordance or Discordance? [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2016; 16 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/skin-as-a-harbinger-of-rejection-of-underlying-structures-in-vascularized-composite-allografts-concordance-or-discordance/. Accessed May 21, 2025.

« Back to 2016 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences