The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program for Donor Hepatectomy; Useful Method for Donor Safety? Or Unnecessary Hindrance?
1Seoul St. Mary's hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 2Bucheon St. Mary's hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Korea, Republic of
Meeting: 2022 American Transplant Congress
Abstract number: 137
Keywords: Living donor, Post-operative complications
Topic: Clinical Science » Liver » 58 - Liver: Living Donor Liver Transplant and Partial Grafts
Session Information
Session Name: Surgery innovative Techniques Including Living Donor
Session Type: Rapid Fire Oral Abstract
Date: Sunday, June 5, 2022
Session Time: 5:30pm-7:00pm
Presentation Time: 6:30pm-6:40pm
Location: Hynes Room 313
*Purpose: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have been reported to reduce the rate of postoperative complications and shorten hospital stays in liver surgery. However, while these achievements could be expected to improve the safety of donor hepatectomy, relevant research on this issue remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and benefits after implementation of an ERAS program on donor hepatectomy in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).
*Methods: We analyzed perioperative outcomes of consecutive patients who underwent donor hepatectomy between January 2016 and October 2020. Patients were divided into the ERAS group (N=42) and the traditional care (TC) group (N=42), and propensity score matching (PSM) was used to define the independent effect of the ERAS program on donor hepatectomy.
*Results: The rate of postoperative morbidity was significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the TC group (11.9 % vs. 31 %, p = 0.033), and the postoperative length of hospital days were significantly shorter in the ERAS group (10.2 vs. 11.4 days, p = 0.039). The postoperative pain scores (p <0.001, 0.012 and 0.005 in postoperative day (POD) 1, 3, and 5) and the number of demands for analgesic in POD 3 and 5 (p = 0.025 and <0.001) were lower in the ERAS group. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (23.8 % vs. 52.4 %, p = 0.027) and the number of demands for antiemetic (0.4 vs. 1.2, p = 0.012) were significantly reduced in the ERAS group.
*Conclusions: ERAS programs applied to the patients undergoing donor hepatectomy can safely and effectively reduce the incidence of complications. In addition, ERAS programs improve the donor’s quality of life during hospitalization and helps them quickly return to their daily routine.
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Choi H, Na G, Park H, Woo Y, Choi Y, Park S, You Y. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program for Donor Hepatectomy; Useful Method for Donor Safety? Or Unnecessary Hindrance? [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2022; 22 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/the-enhanced-recovery-after-surgery-eras-program-for-donor-hepatectomy-useful-method-for-donor-safety-or-unnecessary-hindrance/. Accessed November 21, 2024.« Back to 2022 American Transplant Congress