ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Protocol Biopsies Are Valuable in High Immunologic Risk Patients

S. Patel, S. Mohan, R. Crew, Z. Zaky, D. Tsapepas, L. Ratner

Surgery, Columbia University, New York
Nephrology, Columbia University, New York

Meeting: 2013 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: A842

INTRODUCTION: The utility of protocol allograft biopsies (at prespecified intervals regardless of allograft function) remains unclear even in patients with elevated immunological risk such as flow crossmatch positive (XM+) recipients. We reviewed biopsy findings in our living positive crossmatch recipient cohort to identify whether protocol biopsies were useful.

METHODS/RESULTS: We performed 41 XM+ kidney transplants between 9/1/2004 and 11/30/2012. All patients received pre- and post-txp plasmapheresis (PP) with IVIG replacement (100 mg/kg), maintenance therapy with tacrolimus, and mycophenolate. Induction therapy varied with time but included either an IL-2 receptor antagonist or Thymoglobulin® with/without intra-operative rituximab. All patients received IV methylprednisolone with taper to prednisone 20 mg daily by post-operative day 4. Protocol biopsies were performed at 1, 2, 4, 13, 26 and 52 weeks; then annually. The cohort was 43.8 ± 12.1 years old, 67% female, and 60% had received a previous transplant. In our cohort, 86% of recipients experienced an acute rejection of which 34% had AMR, 43% had ACR and 22% had both. The median time to rejection was 10 days. On follow up, 22% experienced allograft failure and 10% died with functioning allografts.

Only in 2 of the 33 patients was the first rejection episodes detected on "for cause" biopsies. Of the 31 rejections diagnosed on protocol biopsy, 20 were within the first two weeks. Time to first rejection was significantly shorter when detected by protocol biopsies (32 ± 81 vs. 419 ± 504 days, p=0.001). The utility of protocol biopsies is in finding patients who would not have been biopsied otherwise; patients with rejection may have a changing or elevated creatinine as indication for a biopsy. Of the 31 rejections episodes detected on protocol biopsy, 11(36.7%) were in patients with both stable renal function and a creatinine <2 mg/dL.

CONCLUSION: In our living XM+, protocol biopsies were useful in detection of 36.7% of rejections prior to evidence of significant renal dysfunction. Since all the subclinical rejections detected were treated with further immunosuppression, protocol biopsies appear to be useful in guiding the management of high immunological risk recipients.

Biopsy Comparison
Rejection For Cause Biopsy Protocol Biopsy
ACR 50% 43.3%
AMR 50% 33.3%
AMR and ACR 0% 23.3%
Rejection timing    
within 10 days 0% 64.5%
>10 days 100% 34.5%
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Patel S, Mohan S, Crew R, Zaky Z, Tsapepas D, Ratner L. Protocol Biopsies Are Valuable in High Immunologic Risk Patients [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2013; 13 (suppl 5). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/protocol-biopsies-are-valuable-in-high-immunologic-risk-patients/. Accessed May 14, 2025.

« Back to 2013 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences