ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Molecular Markers To Distinguish Modes of Renal Graft Rejection

M. Mikula, K. Livingston, O. Zhukov, F. Hantash, K. Zhang, J. Rion, P. Putheti, C. Snopkowski, A. Buller-Burckle, J. Popov, W. Sun, B. Crossley, M. Hernandez-Fuentes, S. Sacks, M. Suthanthiran, T. Strom, C. Strom, S. Naides

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, SJC, CA
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
NY Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, NYC, NY
King's College, London, England, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2013 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: D1599

Renal transplant recipients may suffer serious consequences from graft rejection. We sought to develop an accurate, noninvasive test that can detect and distinguish acute cellular rejection (ACR), acute tubular necrosis (ATN), and other processes to allow early intervention.

We investigated expression patterns of 6 candidate markers of renal graft failure in 40 transplant recipients undergoing biopsy for suspected rejection. Four of these markers have been associated with ACR: the cytotoxic T lymphocyte markers PRF1 and GZMB; the regulatory T lymphocyte transcription factor FOXP3; and CXCL10 (IP10), a chemokine expressed in T lymphocytes and monocytes. The other 2, NK1 and NK3, are natural killer (NK) cell markers. RNA extracted from blood was reverse-transcribed for real-time PCR. Cycle threshold values were compared to a pooled control sample to give a relative quantity (RQ) for each marker normalized to 2 internal controls (CD3e, ABL1). RQ values above reference ranges, established from 120 health adults, were considered elevated. Biopsy documented ACR in 5 patients, ATN in 8, other processes in 35, and normal results in 2.

Results: ACR and ATN patients exhibited differential expression of ACR (CXCL10, FOXP3, GZMB, PRF1) and NK markers. 4 of 5 ACR patients had ≥1 elevated ACR marker relative to ABL1 and CD3e; 1 also had elevated NK3. All 8 ATN patients had elevated ABL1, and 7 had elevated CXCL10 relative to ABL1. All ATN patients had elevations in 3 or 4 ACR markers relative to CD3e. NK1 was markedly elevated relative to CD3e in 7 ATN patients, and NK3 in 6; 1 patient had normal levels of both. Few transplant recipients with other causes of rejection had marker elevations, and most were mild. 2 patients with normal biopsies had no elevated markers.

Taken together, information from markers of ACR and NK cells may help distinguish between ACR and ATN: Both ATN and ACR may be associated with elevations of ≥1 ACR marker. However, ATN is characterized by marked elevation of ABL1, NK1 or NK3, and ≥1 ACR marker, while ACR is generally characterized by normal levels of ABL1, NK1, and NK3.

Mikula, M.: Employee, Quest Diagnostics. Zhukov, O.: Employee, Quest Diagnostics. Hantash, F.: Employee, Quest Diagnostics. Zhang, K.: Employee, Quest Diagnostics. Rion, J.: Employee, Quest Diagnostics. Buller-Burckle, A.: Employee, Quest Diagnostics. Popov, J.: Employee, Quest Diagnostics. Sun, W.: Employee, Quest Diagnostics. Crossley, B.: Employee, Quest Diagnostics. Strom, C.: Employee, Quest Diagnostics. Naides, S.: Employee, Quest Diagnostics.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mikula M, Livingston K, Zhukov O, Hantash F, Zhang K, Rion J, Putheti P, Snopkowski C, Buller-Burckle A, Popov J, Sun W, Crossley B, Hernandez-Fuentes M, Sacks S, Suthanthiran M, Strom T, Strom C, Naides S. Molecular Markers To Distinguish Modes of Renal Graft Rejection [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2013; 13 (suppl 5). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/molecular-markers-to-distinguish-modes-of-renal-graft-rejection/. Accessed June 6, 2025.

« Back to 2013 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences