ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Modification of the Cavaplasty (Hug Procedure) Technique in Liver Transplantation

Y. Wu, L. Mosna, S. Zhang, K. Wolfe

Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY
First Hospital of Qunming, Qunming, YunNan, China

Meeting: 2013 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: A606

Introduction: The Cavaplasty OLT, now called Hug Procedure, offers advantages for hepatectomy and implantation and eliminates outflow obstruction. However, caval clamping is required during the anhepatic phase, which is challenging in patients with intolerance to cava clamping, preexisting cardiac disease or hemodynamic instability. The Modified Hug Procedure was designed to overcome these shortcomings by avoiding caval cross clamping. These techniques were compared for feasibility, anhepatic phase time, operative time, intraoperative blood requirements, surgical complications, hospital length of stay (LOS), and patient/graft survival.

Methods: 108 first time adult OLTs between May 2005 and December 2010 were reviewed. Patients were grouped in two eras: Era 1 (Hug Procedure), was from May 2005 to June 2009 (n = 73); and Era 2 (Modified Hug Procedure) was from July 2009 to December 2010 (n = 35). The median MELD at transplant was 21 (12-45) in Era 1 and 22 (13-34) in Era 2. Donors were procured using the standard technique. Immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, myfortic and prednisone. All patients were followed for at least 2 years with median follow up of 4.6 years.

Results: Cumulative patient survival at 1 year was 98.8% for Era 1 and 97.1% for Era 2. Cumulative graft survival at 1 year was 95.9% for Era 1 and 91.4% for Era 2. Table 1 displays a comparison of outcomes for Era 1 and Era 2. There were no differences in operative time, pRBC units, or hospital LOS. Anhepatic phase was significantly shorter (p < 0.01) for Era 2 than Era 1. No patients were placed on bypass. There were 4 bile leaks (all resolved by ERCP), 1 intrahepatic artery thrombosis and 1 post operative bleed in Era 1. There was no outflow obstruction in either group.

Table 1. Comparison of Outcomes for Era 1 and Era 2.
  Era 1 Era 2 p-value
  Median (Range) Median (Range)  
Operative Time 3:57 (2:50-8:42) 3:42 (2:27-6:59) 0.051
pRBCs Transfused (Units) 1 (0-21) 1 (0-7) 0.950
Anhepatic Phase (Minutes) 44 (20-77) 35 (18-67) 0.003
Hospital LOS (Days) 5 (3-30) 5 (3-34) 0.620

Conclusion: The Modified Hug Procedure is as feasible, safe and effective as the original Hug Procedure. The caval flow preservation avoids bypass and pressors administration, making this new technique particularly suitable in cases of hemodynamic instability, intolerance to vena cava cross clamping and preexisting cardiovascular disease.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Wu Y, Mosna L, Zhang S, Wolfe K. Modification of the Cavaplasty (Hug Procedure) Technique in Liver Transplantation [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2013; 13 (suppl 5). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/modification-of-the-cavaplasty-hug-procedure-technique-in-liver-transplantation/. Accessed May 14, 2025.

« Back to 2013 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences