Liver Transplantation (LT) in Patients Receiving Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT): Predicting Renal Recovery and Post-Transplant Futility
Surgery, UCLA, LA, CA
Anesthesiology, UCLA, LA, CA
Meeting: 2013 American Transplant Congress
Abstract number: 452
Background: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) system prioritizes liver allocation to patients in renal failure, increasing the number of simultaneous liver-kidney transplants (SLK). Identifying predictors of post-transplant futility (90-day or in-hospital mortality) and renal recovery could maximize utilization of these scarce resources.
Methods: Analysis of adult LT recipients on pre-transplant RRT from July 2004 to September 2012 at a single-institution using 33 recipient, donor, and operative variables. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of futility and dialysis dependence at 3-months.
Results: Of 1546 LT recipients, 529 were on RRT (34%). The mean MELD score was 38. Compared to patients undergoing LT alone (LTA, n=407), SLK (n=94) patients were significantly older and more obese, diabetic, and hypertensive, but less likely hospitalized, on continuous RRT, ventilator-dependent, or on vasopressors. Despite kidney transplantation, 21% of SLK recipients were dialysis-dependent at 3-months, compared to 43% of LTA recipients (P<0.001). Of all futile LTs (n=94, 19%), only 4 patients (4%) became dialysis-independent prior to their death. Futile LT accounted for 43% and 75% of failures to achieve dialysis independence in LTA and SLK, respectively. Multivariate predictors of futility included coagulopathy requiring abdominal packing, pre-transplant length of RRT, mechanical ventilation, recipient and donor age, and hyperlipidemia. In non-futile patients, multivariate predictors of dialysis dependence included non-fulminant etiology, LTA, emergent intraoperative RRT, pre-transplant RRT > 7 days, metabolic syndrome, pre-transplant stay, and gender (Table).
Futility | Dialysis Dependence at 3 mos | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Odds Ratio | P-value | Odds Ratio | P-value | ||
Coagulopathy | 4.4 | <0.01 | Non-fulminant etiology | 9.6 | 0.003 |
Pre-tx RRT > 7 d | 3.3 | 0.001 | LTA | 8.6 | <0.001 |
Intubation | 2.5 | 0.001 | Intraop RRT | 4.2 | 0.04 |
Recipient age > 55 yrs | 2.4 | 0.002 | Pre-tx RRT > 7 d | 2.7 | 0.03 |
Hyperlipidemia | 2.2 | 0.06 | Metabolic Syndrome | 2 | 0.056 |
Donor age > 45 yrs | 2.0 | 0.01 | Pre-transplant LOS > 2 wks | 1.9 | 0.04 |
Female | 1.6 | 0.068 |
Conclusions: We report the largest single-institution experience of LT in patients on pre-transplant RRT. We identified important predictors of post-LT futility and renal recovery that may help to guide the allocation of kidneys in these challenging LT recipients.
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Agopian V, Baber J, Dhillon A, Petrowsky H, Zarrinpar A, Kaldas F, Yersiz H, Farmer D, Hiatt J, Busuttil R. Liver Transplantation (LT) in Patients Receiving Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT): Predicting Renal Recovery and Post-Transplant Futility [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2013; 13 (suppl 5). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/liver-transplantation-lt-in-patients-receiving-renal-replacement-therapy-rrt-predicting-renal-recovery-and-post-transplant-futility/. Accessed November 22, 2024.« Back to 2013 American Transplant Congress