KDPI Usefulness in Spain: A Comparison with Classical ECD/SCD.
1Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
2Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
3Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
Meeting: 2017 American Transplant Congress
Abstract number: A104
Keywords: Allocation, Donors, Kidney transplantation, marginal
Session Information
Session Name: Poster Session A: Deceased Donor Issues I: Allocation, KDPI and Recipient Selection
Session Type: Poster Session
Date: Saturday, April 29, 2017
Session Time: 5:30pm-7:30pm
Presentation Time: 5:30pm-7:30pm
Location: Hall D1
Kidney donor shortage requires an expansion in selection criteria and objective tools to minimize discarded organs. Easy donor pretx variables such as age, standard/expanded criteria donors (SCD/ECD) and Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI), have demonstrated correlations with patient and graft outcomes. We aimed to establish the accuracy of the three models to determine the prognostic value on kidney transplantation (KT) major outcomes.
Retrospective study in deceased donor KT at our institution. Unadjusted Cox and Kaplan-Meier survival, and multivariate Cox analyses were fitted to analyze the impact of the three predictor scores donor age, SCD/ECD and KDPI on outcomes.
389 KT included. Donor age 53.6±15.2y; 41.9% ECD; mean KDPI 69.4±23.4%. Median follow-up 51.9m. Unadjusted Cox and Kaplan-Meier showed that the three prognostic variables (donor age, ECD status and KDPI) were related with increased risk of patient death, graft failure and death-censored graft failure. However, in the multivariate analysis only KDPI was related with higher risk of graft failure (HR 1.03 each 1% [1.01-1.05]; p=0.014). Multivariate models for graft failure were calculated including donor age as a continuous variable, donor age >60y, ECD definition, KDPI (continuous variable) or different KDPI cut-offs (Figure).
SCD/ECD classification did not provide significant prognostic outcome information. KDPI was linearly related with higher risk of graft failure, providing a better assessment. More studies are needed before using KDPI as a tool to discard or accept kidneys for transplantation.
CITATION INFORMATION: Arias-Cabrales C, Pérez-Sáez M, Redondo D, Buxeda A, Burballa C, Bermejo S, Sierra A, Mir M, Burón A, Zapatero A, Crespo M, Pascual J. KDPI Usefulness in Spain: A Comparison with Classical ECD/SCD. Am J Transplant. 2017;17 (suppl 3).
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Arias-Cabrales C, Pérez-Sáez M, Redondo D, Buxeda A, Burballa C, Bermejo S, Sierra A, Mir M, Burón A, Zapatero A, Crespo M, Pascual J. KDPI Usefulness in Spain: A Comparison with Classical ECD/SCD. [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2017; 17 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/kdpi-usefulness-in-spain-a-comparison-with-classical-ecdscd/. Accessed November 22, 2024.« Back to 2017 American Transplant Congress