ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Implanting a Robot-Assisted Kidney Transplant Program for ASTS Trained Transplant Surgeons with No Robotic Surgery Background

B. Kocak1, N. Celik1, E. Arpali1, B. Akyollu1, B. Kilicer1, E. Canda2, Y. Kordan2

1Division of Organ Transplantation, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, 2Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Meeting: 2022 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: 289

Keywords: Kidney transplantation, Living donor, Surgical complications

Topic: Clinical Science » Kidney » 41 - Kidney Technical

Session Information

Session Name: Kidney Technical

Session Type: Rapid Fire Oral Abstract

Date: Monday, June 6, 2022

Session Time: 5:30pm-7:00pm

 Presentation Time: 5:40pm-5:50pm

Location: Hynes Room 312

*Purpose: Robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) was introduced and has been performed commonly by surgeons experienced with robotic surgery and with this single center study we aimed to point out the important steps when we were implanting our RAKT program as ASTS trained transplant surgeons with no robotic surgery background.

*Methods: The preparation period was detailed regarding mentors-supervisors, attended courses and, robotic practice prior to the RAKT. We retrospectively analyzed RAKT patients in terms of patient and donor characteristics, indications, console and rewarming times, times for vascular and ureterovesical anastomoses along with the postoperative complications and, patient and graft survivals.

*Results: All RAKTs were performed by the same ASTS trained transplant surgeon. First step was the intense simulator training and intense robotic training with vascular anastomosis model followed by the hands-on RAKT training courses at highly experienced institutions. Performing surgeon attended 3 standardized courses at different time points. The same surgeon performed 15 robot-assisted donor nephrectomies prior to the recipient operation. Out of 428 renal transplantation, we performed 21 RAKT between January 2020 and December 2021. The patient request was the indication for RAKT. Recipient surgeries were performed with Da Vinci Xi with allografts procured with hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. First 5 cases were carried out under the supervision of expert RAKT surgeons. The median recipient age was 31 years (range 16-58 years) with median BMI of 21.5 (range 15.8-30.5). The median console and rewarming times were 222 min (range 155-360 min) and 68 min (range 58-89 min) respectively. The median total vascular anastomosis time was 34.5 minutes (range 29-50 minutes), while the median ureterovesical anastomosis time was 28 min (range 16-60 min). There was no perioperative complications and 10 patients needed posttransplant blood transfusion including one patient with intraabdominal bleeding and laparotomy for intestinal obstruction. There was no delayed graft function. Overall patient and graft survival rates were 100% with excellent graft function in the median follow up period of 7.2 months (range 0.7-23 months).

*Conclusions: RAKT requires a very meticulous preparation for transplant surgeons with no robotic surgery background. Well training with standardized hands-on RAKT courses and cooperation between the surgeon and the assistants are crucial to reduce console and rewarming times.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kocak B, Celik N, Arpali E, Akyollu B, Kilicer B, Canda E, Kordan Y. Implanting a Robot-Assisted Kidney Transplant Program for ASTS Trained Transplant Surgeons with No Robotic Surgery Background [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2022; 22 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/implanting-a-robot-assisted-kidney-transplant-program-for-asts-trained-transplant-surgeons-with-no-robotic-surgery-background/. Accessed May 9, 2025.

« Back to 2022 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences