Efficacy and Safety of Bleselumab in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Study
1University of Arizona, Tucson
2Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Dallas
3Rush University, Chicago
4PinnacleHealth Transplant Associates, Harrisburg
5University of Maryland, Baltimore
6Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., Northbrook.
Meeting: 2018 American Transplant Congress
Abstract number: 524
Keywords: Immunosuppression, Kidney transplantation
Session Information
Session Name: Concurrent Session: Kidney Immunosuppression: General Considerations - 2
Session Type: Concurrent Session
Date: Tuesday, June 5, 2018
Session Time: 4:30pm-6:00pm
Presentation Time: 4:54pm-5:06pm
Location: Room 6A
Introduction: Bleselumab (ASKP1240) is an anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody currently in development. This phase 2, randomized, open-label study assessed the efficacy and safety of bleselumab in de novo kidney transplant recipients over 36 months post-transplant (NCT01780844).
Methods: Transplant recipients were randomized (1:1:1) to:
[middot] Standard of care (SoC) with immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-T; 0.1 mg/kg/day; target Ctrough 4–11 ng/mL) + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; 1 g twice daily)
[middot] Bleselumab (200 mg on Days 0/7/14/28/42/56/70/90, and monthly thereafter) + IR-T (0.1 mg/kg/day; target Ctrough 4–11 ng/mL days 0–30, then 2–5 ng/mL)
[middot] Bleselumab (dosing regimen as per bleselumab + IR-T group) + MMF
All received basiliximab induction (20 mg injection pre-transplant and on Day 3–5 post-transplant) and corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR; Banff grade ≥1) through month 6. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed to 6 months post-transplant; serious TEAEs were recorded for 36 months.
Results: 149 patients were randomized: 138 received ≥1 dose of study drug (SoC [n=48]; bleselumab + IR-T [n=44]; bleselumab + MMF [n=46]). Bleselumab + IR-T treatment demonstrated noninferiority with SoC: at 6 months post-transplant, BPAR incidence was 3 (6%) for SoC, 4 (9%; P=0.706 vs SoC) for bleselumab + IR-T, and 17 (37%; P<0.001 vs SoC) for bleselumab + MMF; at 36 months, BPAR incidence was 6 (13%), 5 (11%; P=1.000), and 19 (41%; P=0.002), respectively. 138 transplant recipients experienced a TEAE during the 6-month treatment period. The bleselumab + MMF group had a higher incidence of serious TEAEs and TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation compared with the bleselumab + IR-T group. Both groups had greater incidences of drug-related TEAEs and TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation compared with SoC. There were 4 deaths (2 per bleselumab group) during this study, none deemed related to bleselumab.
Conclusions: Treatment with bleselumab + IR-T over 36 months demonstrated similar efficacy in the prevention of BPAR compared with SoC. No new safety signals were observed.
CITATION INFORMATION: Harland R., Klintmalm G., Jensik S., Yang H., Bromberg J., Holman J., Anil Kumar M., Santos V., Larson T., Wang X. Efficacy and Safety of Bleselumab in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Study Am J Transplant. 2017;17 (suppl 3).
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Harland R, Klintmalm G, Jensik S, Yang H, Bromberg J, Holman J, Kumar MAnil, Santos V, Larson T, Wang X. Efficacy and Safety of Bleselumab in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Study [abstract]. https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-bleselumab-in-kidney-transplant-recipients-a-phase-2-randomized-open-label-study/. Accessed November 21, 2024.« Back to 2018 American Transplant Congress