Effect of Everolimus Versus Tacrolimus On Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Renal Transplant Patients On Maintenance
J. Morales,1 J. Pascual,2 A. Sánchez-Fructuoso,3 D. Serón,4 J. Díaz,5 F. Oppenheimer,6 M. Rengel,7 D. Hernández,8 J. Cruzado,9 On Behalf of Evita Study Group.
1Fund. Investigación, H. 12 Octubre, Madrid, Spain
2S. Nefrología, H. del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
3S. Nefrología, H. Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
4S. Nefrología, H. Vall Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain
5S. Nefrología, Fund. Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
6Unidad Trasp. Renal, H. Clínic i Provincial Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
7S. Urología, H. Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
8S. Nefrología, H. Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain
9S. Nefrología, H. Bellvitge. IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain.
Meeting: 2015 American Transplant Congress
Abstract number: A176
Keywords: Kidney transplantation
Session Information
Session Name: Poster Session A: Kidney: Cardiovascular and Metabolic
Session Type: Poster Session
Date: Saturday, May 2, 2015
Session Time: 5:30pm-7:30pm
Presentation Time: 5:30pm-7:30pm
Location: Exhibit Hall E
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of everolimus (EVL) in improving LVH in a regimen with mycophenolic acid (MPA) vs tacrolimus (TAC)+MPA in maintenance renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Multicentre, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, 24 months follow-up. Patients 18-70 years, first/second renal transplant >6months-≤3 years on TAC+MPA, were included. Patients with serum creatinine ≥2 mg/l; glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≤40 ml/min; proteinuria ≥500 mg/24h, severe rejection and PRA ≥20%, were excluded. LVH was defined by Zoccali's formula. RESULTS: 60 patients were included (28 EVL;32 TAC; ITT population). Both groups had similar baseline characteristics: mean(SD) age 48.3(12.5) years; 58.3% men; BMI 26.5(4.3) kg/m2; 90.0% first transplant. 83.3% had 0% PRA. Systemic steroid treatments were similar (67.9% EVL;71.9% TAC). Mean time since transplantation was 1.5(0.8) years. Proteinuria at baseline was similar (EVL: 0.21;TAC: 0.17 g/24h). LVH values and GFR are described in Table 1.
TAC (N=32) | EVL (N=28) | Total (N=60) | |
LVH1, n(%) | |||
Baseline | 19(59.4) | 16(57.1) | 35(58.3) |
Month-12 | 20(62.5) | 17(60.7) | 37(61.6) |
Month-24 | 12(37.5) | 12(42.9) | 24(40.0) |
GFR2 (ml/min/1.73m2), mean(SD) | |||
Baseline | 59.9(13.4) | 58.7(15.0) | 59.3(14.0) |
Month-6 | 56.0(11.2) | 62.8(18.1) | 59.1(15.0) |
Month-12 | 57.8(11.4) | 61.2(19.2) | 59.4(15.5) |
Month-24 | 57.7(10.5) | 60.8(17.4) | 59.2(14.0) |
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Morales J, Pascual J, Sánchez-Fructuoso A, Serón D, Díaz J, Oppenheimer F, Rengel M, Hernández D, Cruzado J. Effect of Everolimus Versus Tacrolimus On Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Renal Transplant Patients On Maintenance [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2015; 15 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/effect-of-everolimus-versus-tacrolimus-on-left-ventricular-hypertrophy-in-renal-transplant-patients-on-maintenance/. Accessed November 21, 2024.« Back to 2015 American Transplant Congress