ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Comparison of Transumbilical and Conventional Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy

M. Minz, V. Kaji, A. Sharma, S. Singh, D. Kenwar

Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Meeting: 2013 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: B910

Forty-eight healthy voluntary renal donors between 18 and 60 years of age with BMI less than 30 who were planned for laparoscopic left side donor nephrectomy were enrolled. After randomization 25 donors (group A) underwent a laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with a kidney retrieval via Pfannenstiel incision whereas in 23 donors (group B) the kidney was extracted via a midline extension of the transumbilical port.

Both groups of recipients were comparable in terms of basic renal disease and received CNI, MMF and steroid. There were no operative complications in both groups.

Mean duration of surgery and warm ischemia time were comparable (227.12 min/ 263 seconds in group A versus 228.91 min/ 283 seconds in group B). Estimated blood loss was similar in both groups (165.6 ml in group A versus 151.3 ml in group B).

Weight of the kidneys (128.2 gm in group A vs. 120.4 gm in group B), length of renal artery (2.37 cm in group A vs. 2.30 cm in group B) and length of renal vein (2.58 cm in group A vs. 2.67 cm in group B) were statistically similar in both groups.

Length of ureter (8.7 cm in group A vs. 10.17 cm in group B) and length of extraction site incision (7.95 cm in group A vs. 10.17 cm in group B) showed statistically significant difference.

Pain scores noted by numerical rating scale on day 1 (8 in group A vs. 6 in group B) and 3 (6 in group A vs. 3 in group B) after surgery and at time of discharge (5 in group A vs. 3 in group B) showed statistically significant difference. Both groups of donors rated pain at 0 at 1 month following surgery. Day of discharge was similar in both groups with median 3 days post operative stay.

Serum creatinine of recipients on day 1 (2.57 vs. 2.99 mg/dl in groups A and B respectively) and 3 (1.74 vs. 2.15 mg/dl in groups A and B respectively) after surgery were comparable while mean serum creatinine on post operative day 7 (1.74 vs. 2.15 mg/dl in groups A and B respectively) was significantly higher in recipients of group B. Serum creatinine of recipients at 1 month post transplantation was similar in both groups (1.11 vs. 1.18 mg/dl in groups A and B respectively). The higher creatinine at day 7 may be explained by two patients in group B who had delayed graft function due to calcineurin inhibitor toxicity.

In conclusion the lower pain scores and shorter incision length with similar outcomes suggests that a transumbilical route may be a more acceptable route for kidney retrieval.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Minz M, Kaji V, Sharma A, Singh S, Kenwar D. Comparison of Transumbilical and Conventional Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2013; 13 (suppl 5). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/comparison-of-transumbilical-and-conventional-laparoscopic-donor-nephrectomy/. Accessed May 17, 2025.

« Back to 2013 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences