ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Comparison of Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation Scores to Medication Adherence Assessment Findings in Kidney Transplant Candidates Undergoing Living Donor Transplant

J. Trofe-Clark1, G. Malat1, M. Norris1, M. Bleicher2, E. Smith3, D. Sawinski2, R. Weinrieb4, R. Bloom2

1Pharmacy, Hospital of Univ of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2Renal Division, Univ of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 3Social Work, Hosp of Univ of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 4Pyschiatry, Univ of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Meeting: 2020 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: B-238

Keywords: Outpatients, Post-operative complications, Screening

Session Information

Session Name: Poster Session B: Psychosocial and Treatment Adherence

Session Type: Poster Session

Date: Saturday, May 30, 2020

Session Time: 3:15pm-4:00pm

 Presentation Time: 3:30pm-4:00pm

Location: Virtual

*Purpose: The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) is a standardized, evaluation tool intended to assess psychosocial health in organ transplant candidates. The purpose of this study was to 1) compare SIPAT scores to standardized medication adherence assessment findings in kidney transplant (KTX) candidates undergoing living donor KTx and 2) assess data on these recipients reporting missing medications at 1 and 6 months post KTx.

*Methods: This was a retrospective study of HIV negative KTx candidates who underwent living donor KTx at our center 7/1/18-8/29/19. All candidates were seen by a transplant pharmacist for standardized medication adherence assessment, and education was provided based on findings. A transplant social worker saw all candidates for SIPAT scoring. Data on missing medications at 1 and 6 month post-KTx visits were collected from standardized documentation.

*Results: Seventy-seven KTx candidates were included. Medication adherence assessments were completed at a mean(SD) of 9 (±20) days pre-KTx. Data for missing/late medications was unavailable in 2 candidates. SIPAT scoring was completed at 264 (±139) days pre-KTX. Candidate mean (SD) age at adherence assessment was 46 (±10) yrs, 57% were male, 83% were white, 17% were re-KTx, and 97% completed ≥ high school education. Classification of SIPAT candidate scores were: “excellent” (43%), “good” (52%) and “minimally acceptable”(5%). Fewer “excellent candidates” demonstrated late/missed medications within 2 wks prior to their assessment, or medication discontinuation at any point without medical advice vs “good candidates” (Table 1). Overall, missed medications at 1 and 6 months post-KTx were <5%.

*Conclusions: 1) Only about two-thirds of KTx candidates classified by SIPAT as “excellent candidates” utilized adherence tools. 2) A lower percent of KTx candidates with “excellent” SIPAT scores acknowledged late/missed medications or stopping medications without medical advice versus those with “good ” SIPAT candidate scores. 3) Minimal medication non-adherence was documented at 1 and 6 months post KTx, suggesting that individualizing education based on adherence assessment findings in KTx candidates may potentially improve medication adherence.

Table 1: Medication Adherence Assessment Findings
Parameter Evaluated SIPAT “Excellent Candidate”(n = 33) SIPAT “Good Candidate”(n = 44) p value
Pill box use 17 (52%) 24 (55%) 0.82
Active medication list 22 (67%) 33 (75%) 0.50
Medication reminder(s) use 3 (9%) 8 (18%) 0.33
Medication(s) late in past 2 wks 4 (12%) 9 (21%) 0.38
Missed medication(s) in past 2 wks 6 (18%) 11 (25%) 0.58
Ever stopped medication(s) without medical advice 2 (6%) 9 (21%) 0.11
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Trofe-Clark J, Malat G, Norris M, Bleicher M, Smith E, Sawinski D, Weinrieb R, Bloom R. Comparison of Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation Scores to Medication Adherence Assessment Findings in Kidney Transplant Candidates Undergoing Living Donor Transplant [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2020; 20 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/comparison-of-stanford-integrated-psychosocial-assessment-for-transplantation-scores-to-medication-adherence-assessment-findings-in-kidney-transplant-candidates-undergoing-living-donor-transplant/. Accessed May 16, 2025.

« Back to 2020 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences