ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Comparison of Portal vs Systemic Venous Drained Pancreas Transplantation Alone Matched by Propensity Score Analysis

F. Vistoli, N. Napoli, F. Palumbo, E. Kauffmann, V. Perrone, S. Iacopi, C. Lombardo, G. Amorese, P. Marchetti, U. Boggi

Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation Center, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

Meeting: 2019 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: D268

Keywords: Pancreas transplantation

Session Information

Session Name: Poster Session D: Pancreas and Islet: All Topics

Session Type: Poster Session

Date: Tuesday, June 4, 2019

Session Time: 6:00pm-7:00pm

 Presentation Time: 6:00pm-7:00pm

Location: Hall C & D

*Purpose: Portal drainage (PD) of pancreas grafts has been associated with improved metabolic profile and fewer rejection episodes than systemic drainage (SD). These advantages would be especially useful in pancreas transplant alone (PTA) recipients due to their higher risk of rejection and their metabolic disarrangements. We compare our experience with PD and SD in PTA.

*Methods: Between December 2000 and May 2017 the venous effluent of 101 PTA was managed by PD (n=65) or SD (n=36). Exocrine secretions were drained enterically in all but two recipient. The groups were well matched for all baseline characteristics and were managed with equivalent maintenance immunosuppression. Basiliximab (41 PD vs 14 SD) or thymoglobuline (24 PD vs 22 SD) were alternatively used as induction therapy. The comparison of the two drainage groups was performed applying the Propensity Score Matching (PSM) on a 1(SD):2(PD) basis, in order to obtain greater homogeneity. Data were analyzed in terms of graft survival, complete thrombosis of the graft, acute 6-month rejection rate, overall acute rejection rate and chronic rejection, recorded for the maximum follow-up time for each patient.

*Results: Overall, delayed endocrine pancreas function rate was 0 in the SD group vs 1.5% in the PD group. Six grafts were lost in the early post-PTA course due to vascular thrombosis (2 SD vs 1 PD) and humoral rejection (0 SD vs 3 PD). Relaparotomy rate was 19.4% in SD and 15.4% in PD group. PSM selected 57 PD vs 26 SD. No significant differences between the two types of drainage in terms graft survival (Odds ratio = 0.67 (0.31-1.53), p = 0.33), overall acute rejection (Odds Ratio = 0.40 (0.15-1.09), p = 0.07) and chronic rejection (Odds Ratio = 0.44 (0.14-1.42), p = 0.17) were recorded. Six-month acute rejection rate (Odds Ratio = 5.16 * 10 ^ -9 (na-0.02), p <0.0001) was significantly lower in the portal drainage group. No difference was seen in thrombosis onset (odds ratio = 0.44 (0.05-3.81), p = 0.43). Glycemic control was excellent in both groups, but fasting serum insulin levels were significantly lower in PD. Patient survival at 1 and 5 years was 100% (SD) vs. 98.2% (PD) at either time points. Equivalent figures for insulin independence were 78.9% and 61.3% (SD) vs 87.9% and 80.1% (PD)

*Conclusions: Either routes of venous drainage are suitable for PTA, although more recipients experience rejection with SD as compared with PD in the early post-transplant period. This difference, already statistically relevant, could become even more prominent with larger randomized series.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Vistoli F, Napoli N, Palumbo F, Kauffmann E, Perrone V, Iacopi S, Lombardo C, Amorese G, Marchetti P, Boggi U. Comparison of Portal vs Systemic Venous Drained Pancreas Transplantation Alone Matched by Propensity Score Analysis [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2019; 19 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/comparison-of-portal-vs-systemic-venous-drained-pancreas-transplantation-alone-matched-by-propensity-score-analysis/. Accessed May 13, 2025.

« Back to 2019 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences