ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

2021 Outcomes Analysis Of U.S. Transplant Centers Performing High Volumes Of Hard To Place Kidneys

D. Bahl1, A. Mahajan2, M. Smogorzewski3, Y. A. Qazi4

1St. George's University, St Georges, Grenada, 2University College Cork School Of Medicine, Cork City, Ireland, 3Keck Medical Center at USC, los angeles, CA, 4Keck Medical Center at USC, LOS ANGELES, CA

Meeting: 2022 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: 9015

Keywords: Kidney transplantation, Outcome, Risk factors

Topic: Clinical Science » Kidney » 32 - Kidney Deceased Donor Selection

Session Information

Session Name: Late Breaking: Clinical

Session Type: Rapid Fire Oral Abstract

Date: Sunday, June 5, 2022

Session Time: 3:30pm-5:00pm

 Presentation Time: 3:50pm-4:00pm

Location: Hynes Room 313

*Purpose: Despite a growing number of patients awaiting a kidney transplant, discard rate remains significantly high. The UNOS SRTR data now provides information on all centers about Hard-to-Place Kidneys (HTPK), which by definition are allografts allocated and transplanted after initial 100 offers. Our study is an outcomes analysis study of centers that perform high volumes of HTPK, as well as provides a trends analysis for centers that were deemed as high volume in the previous data cycle.

*Methods: Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) data for all active US kidney transplant center’s was analyzed to identify centers likely to accept HTPK. Of these programs, High Volume HTPK centers were defined as ones that performed more than a 30 such transplants(tx)/year and their patient and graft survivals (outcomes) were noted. The time period for number of Tx performed was 1/1/20 to 12/31/20. This data was compared to the previous two cycles of data, from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19, 1/1/18 to 12/31/18, and 1/1/17 to 12/21/17. *

*Results: A total of 2490 HTPK were transplanted in this time period. Only 27/218 (12.4%) of all U.S. Tx centers performed high volume HTPK centers but accounted for 1661/2490 (66.7%) of such Tx. 7/27(25.9%) had outcomes as expected , 9/27 (33.3%) had worse than expected outcomes, and 11/27 (40.7%) had outcomes better than expected. When analyzing HTPK center locations by UNOS regions, region 9 transplanted the most HTPK’s with six centers; 6/27 (22.2%), followed by region 3 with five centers; 5/27 (18.5%), region 5 with four centers; 4/27 (14.8%), regions 2 and 4 with three centers; 3/27 (11.1% each), region 11 with two centers: 2/27 (7.4%), while regions 6,7,8, and 10 each had one center; 1/27 (3.7% each). 40.7% of HTPK centers were located in AZ, CA, and NY. Region 9 transplanted highest volume of HTPK’s and accounts for the third highest number of transplanted kidneys by region. Compared to the last data cycle, there has been a 13.5% increase in overall volume of HPTK’s, as well as a 28.6% increase in centers performing transplants with HTPK’s.

*Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that only 12.4% of all U.S Tx centers are high volume utilizers of HTPK. Our study locates over 49% of such centers in 4 states: Arizona, California, Florida, and New York. Of note is the rise in more high volume centers, but a decline in number of expected or above expected outcomes (66.6% this cycle vs 90% last cycle). As new organ allocation policies are formulated, center preferences need to be captured in more granularity to identify centers likely to accept a HTPK. Our study suggests when new allocation policies are formulated, algorithms be considered specifically for organs likely to be classified as HTPK and center experience be factored. Expedited offers to such centers would increase the utilization and reduce discard.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bahl D, Mahajan A, Smogorzewski M, Qazi YA. 2021 Outcomes Analysis Of U.S. Transplant Centers Performing High Volumes Of Hard To Place Kidneys [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2022; 22 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/2021-outcomes-analysis-of-u-s-transplant-centers-performing-high-volumes-of-hard-to-place-kidneys/. Accessed May 30, 2025.

« Back to 2022 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences