ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Should Only Active Candidates Define the EPTS Top 20% in the New Kidney Allocation System (KAS)?

D. Stewart,1 A. Kucheryavaya,1 G. Boyle,1 M. Aeder,2 R. Formica.3

1UNOS, Richmond, VA
2Univ Hosp Case Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH
3Yale, New Haven, CT.

Meeting: 2015 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: 89

Keywords: Allocation, Kidney transplantation, Survival

Session Information

Session Name: Concurrent Session: Economics, Policy and Ethics

Session Type: Concurrent Session

Date: Sunday, May 3, 2015

Session Time: 4:00pm-5:30pm

 Presentation Time: 5:12pm-5:24pm

Location: Room 118-C

Background: The 20% of kidney candidates with the highest Estimated Post-Transplant Survival (EPTS) receive priority for a high longevity kidney in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network's (OPTN) new KAS. The top 20% is based on a snapshot of all adults on the kidney waitlist on a specific date. Both active and inactive adults receive an EPTS score, since at any moment an inactive candidate may be reactivated.

Methods: We used OPTN data to analyze EPTS scores for 60,743 active and 40,054 inactive adult kidney candidates on the waitlist 10/31/14. Lower scores reflect longer expected post-transplant patient survival.

Results: Though inactive candidates less often had a prior transplant (15.1% v 15.7%), they tended to be older (54.7 v 53.4), have longer time on dialysis (4.5 v 3.3 yrs), and were more often diabetic (48.5% v 43.6%) (Fig 1). In turn, the EPTS distribution was higher for inactive patients (Fig 2).The top 20% of all adults patients were those with a score less than 1.48 (20th percentile). 22% of active, but only 17% of inactive patients, had scores less than 1.48. When we used only active patients to define the top 20%, the threshold dropped to 1.42. By definition, 20% of active patients qualified, but only 15% of inactive patients did, a net drop of 1,857 patients. With this new threshold, qualifying patients were younger (35.9 v 36.8) and less often diabetic (1.4% v 1.9%); gender, race were similar.

Conclusions: Using only active patients to define the top 20% would lead to fewer but slightly healthier candidates receiving priority for high-longevity kidneys. Though this change could lead to slightly improved longevity matching between kidneys and recipients, it would narrow access to the highest quality kidneys and should thus be considered carefully.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Stewart D, Kucheryavaya A, Boyle G, Aeder M, Formica R. Should Only Active Candidates Define the EPTS Top 20% in the New Kidney Allocation System (KAS)? [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2015; 15 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/should-only-active-candidates-define-the-epts-top-20-in-the-new-kidney-allocation-system-kas/. Accessed May 19, 2025.

« Back to 2015 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences