ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

A Randomized Assessment of a County-Wide, Primary Care Provider (PCP) Office-Based Intervention for Organ Donor Registration

M. McCabe1, K. M. Dokus2, N. J. Ryan2, A. James2, P. Veazie1, M. Orloff2, S. McIntosh2, R. Kashyap2

1University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, 2University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY

Meeting: 2022 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: 1329

Keywords: Donation, Public policy

Topic: Clinical Science » Public Policy » 21 - Non-Organ Specific: Public Policy & Allocation

Session Information

Session Name: Non-Organ Specific: Public Policy & Allocation

Session Type: Poster Abstract

Date: Monday, June 6, 2022

Session Time: 7:00pm-8:00pm

 Presentation Time: 7:00pm-8:00pm

Location: Hynes Halls C & D

*Purpose: The number of individuals awaiting organ transplantation continues to rise steadily, with the current waitlist totaling over 100,000 patients. However, rates of organ donor registration have not kept pace, and need continues to far exceed supply. Low registration rates persist in large part because of an “opt-in” model of registration as well as limited points of engagement for registering new donors; in New York State particularly, the DMV. This study hypothesized that a PCP’s office would be an effective and feasible location for registration and may prove superior to the traditional site (DMV). To this end, the study sought to compare rates of new registration in these settings under control conditions as well as with the addition of an office-based intervention intended to increase registration rates through the delivery of pro-donation messaging from PCPs.

*Methods: 12 PCP offices in Monroe County, NY participated in the study; donor registration data was obtained from all Monroe County DMV sites for the time course of the study through the appropriate agencies. The study was divided into two weeks. The first week comprised the control group. All presenting patients completed a questionnaire determining demographic characteristics and donor registration status. Patients were provided with a registration form without further intervention. In the second (intervention) week, exam rooms were outfitted with a motivational poster; patients were further provided with an informational brochure and providers delivered a script encouraging registration.

*Results: A total of 1292 individuals participated in the control phase. 1099 individuals participated in the study phase, while 11,147 individuals visited the DMV during the same time period. The percentage of new donors registered during the control week was 33.8% (289); the percentage registered during the intervention week was 7.88 (61), yielding a significant difference (χ2=147.77, p<0.001). Percentage of new registration at the DMV over both weeks was 21.02%; yielding a significant difference from both control and intervention groups (χ2=39.7, 109.8; p<0.001).

*Conclusions: This study demonstrated that PCP offices are a feasible location for registering new organ donors, and that registration rates may be superior to traditional registration sites like the DMV. It also demonstrated that the institution of a pro-registration interventions is not guaranteed to raise registration rates; the wide inter-group variation seen in this study implies factors other than awareness and availability of registration materials significantly affect individual’s willingness to become new donors, warranting further investigation.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

McCabe M, Dokus KM, Ryan NJ, James A, Veazie P, Orloff M, McIntosh S, Kashyap R. A Randomized Assessment of a County-Wide, Primary Care Provider (PCP) Office-Based Intervention for Organ Donor Registration [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2022; 22 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/a-randomized-assessment-of-a-county-wide-primary-care-provider-pcp-office-based-intervention-for-organ-donor-registration/. Accessed June 16, 2025.

« Back to 2022 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences