Preferences of Potential Living Kidney Donors on Strategies to Reduce Donation-Related Financial Burden
A. D. Waterman1, O. N. Ranasinghe1, Y. Cui2, J. L. Beaumont2, D. Adey3, B. Campbell4, F. L. Weng5
1Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 2Terasaki Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, 3UCSF Health, San Francisco, CA, 4Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 5St. Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ
Meeting: 2020 American Transplant Congress
Abstract number: 237
Keywords: Economics, Kidney transplantation, Living donor, Psychosocial
Session Information
Session Name: Kidney Living Donor: Selection
Session Type: Oral Abstract Session
Date: Saturday, May 30, 2020
Session Time: 3:15pm-4:45pm
Presentation Time: 3:15pm-3:27pm
Location: Virtual
*Purpose: To identify the severity of financial and employment challenges present for potential living kidney donors and the value of strategies to make kidney donation cost-neutral,
*Methods: we surveyed 588 potential donors undergoing evaluation at five transplant centers about the maximum amount of out-of-pocket costs and length of time off work they could take, and whether ten strategies would make it easier to donate.
*Results: Donors were 61% female, 56% White, 15% Black, 16% Hispanic, and 8% Asian. Nearly half (54%) had a college education. 46% had an income <$75,000, with 52% able to support themselves for < 6 months if income was lost. Most donors (78%) could take > 1 month off work without serious consequences, with 16% reporting <2 weeks. Though a majority (52%) were able to pay donation costs of >$1,000, 7% reported not being able to pay anything. Over 70% of donors reported that 9 of 10 strategies, like covering costs of meals, travel, lost wages, insurance protections, transplant priority for a relative, or a charitable donation would be moderately/extremely helpful, with non-Whites reporting that these strategies would be more helpful than Whites (Table). Only 42% reported that a cash gift would be moderately or extremely helpful, with non-Whites reporting greater helpfulness than Whites. When asked what amount of money would be fair, 60% reported that they would not want any money, while 10% reported amounts >$100,000 (Table).
*Conclusions: Increases in the number of potential living donors, particularly non-white donors, might be possible if greater financial and donor protections, including, potentially, cash gifts, were made available and advertised more broadly.
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Waterman AD, Ranasinghe ON, Cui Y, Beaumont JL, Adey D, Campbell B, Weng FL. Preferences of Potential Living Kidney Donors on Strategies to Reduce Donation-Related Financial Burden [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2020; 20 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/preferences-of-potential-living-kidney-donors-on-strategies-to-reduce-donation-related-financial-burden/. Accessed November 22, 2024.« Back to 2020 American Transplant Congress